There are several categories of "important":

Breaking: 2569, 3923, 4079.

Highlights: 4134 (interval expressions), 4080 (character literals as
aliases), 3923 (change how planner rules are parameterized); 2160
(spatial functions).

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:11 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would say yes.
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, 13:32 Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is the highlight section a right place for [1] as it has bigger impact?
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/19edf52c76c6a1507721f5bd37f2a33497aa0c4c
> >
> > -Rui
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:48 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Does anybody want to mention any highlights for 1.25 besides removal of
> > > deprecated methods  ?
> > >
> > > Currently it says:
> > > =======
> > > This release comes shortly after 1.24.0 (in just two weeks) and removes
> > > methods which were deprecated in the previous version.
> > > =======
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andrei.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:12 AM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting the release today. If there are some PRs which you would
> > > like
> > > > to be included in 1.25 please let me know ASAP.
> > > >
> > > > This should be a quick release mostly for CALCITE-4136
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andrei.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:33 AM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Andrei,
> > > >>
> > > >> We agreed that this would be a quick release. Above I mentioned Aug
> > > >> 8th as a target, and it's Aug 7th already. Can you start moving the
> > > >> release process along, please.
> > > >>
> > > >> Julian
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:23 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Julian,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Yes this time I should have enough cycles for the release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Also, I think Danny did the heavy lifting with 1.22 since it wasn't
> > an
> > > >> easy
> > > >> > one.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Andrei.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020, 16:16 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Andrei,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > That would be great. Last time I recall you had a crunch at
> > $dayjob
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > didn’t leave you with enough cycles to be release manager. I think
> > > >> this
> > > >> > > release should be timely, so if that is a concern this time
> > around,
> > > >> let us
> > > >> > > know.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > (Maybe the fact that this release is very time-boxed will make
> > that
> > > >> less
> > > >> > > of a risk. I really think we could get this done in by Aug 8 -
> > i.e.
> > > 2
> > > >> weeks
> > > >> > > - if we focus.)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Julian
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > On Jul 24, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > It should be me.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I swapped the 1.22 release with Danny Chen who was supposed to
> > be
> > > >> release
> > > >> > > > manager for 1.25
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:52 PM Haisheng Yuan <
> > [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> Do we have release manager for v1.25.0?
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> On 2020/07/23 17:15:12, Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >>> The release vote for 1.24 RC0 just passed [1], and it will be
> > > >> released
> > > >> > > >> shortly.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> We planned that release 1.24 is a transitional release, and
> > 1.25
> > > >> will
> > > >> > > >> follow soon afterwards. 1.24 deprecates some APIs that we
> > intend
> > > to
> > > >> > > remove
> > > >> > > >> in 1.25. We had to make the release so that people can see that
> > > >> the APIs
> > > >> > > >> are deprecated, and replace them with the new versions.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> During the release vote we ran into 4136 [2]. This is a real
> > > bug,
> > > >> > > caused
> > > >> > > >> in part by the API changes to deprecate APIs (and provide
> > > long-term
> > > >> > > >> replacements) and in part caused by 4079 [3], the real bug that
> > > we
> > > >> are
> > > >> > > >> trying to solve in 1.25.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> So, it is important that we release 1.25 soon, and that it
> > > solves
> > > >> all
> > > >> > > of
> > > >> > > >> these problems. I don’t know whether people will perceive 1.24
> > > as a
> > > >> > > release
> > > >> > > >> “lower than our usual quality” (even though there are good
> > > reasons
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > it)
> > > >> > > >> but 1.25 needs to be back to the usual quality.
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> Julian
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4117 <
> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4117>
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4136 <
> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4136>
> > > >> > > >>>
> > > >> > > >>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4079 <
> > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4079>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to