Hi All,

I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to validate
RC0 please do so before Wednesday.

Regards,
Andrei.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda <and...@sereda.cc> wrote:

> Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrei,
>>
>> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s key.
>> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the file,
>> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda <and...@sereda.cc> wrote:
>> >
>> > 
>> >>
>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
>> the
>> > release announcement.
>> >
>> > I see my signing key in KEYS
>> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS |
>> grep
>> > sereda
>> > sig          C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
>> KEY) <
>> > ser...@apache.org>
>> > sig          C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING
>> KEY) <
>> > ser...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by your
>> +1) ?
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (binding)
>> >>
>> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran tests
>> on
>> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
>> >>
>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before
>> the
>> >> release announcement.
>> >>
>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in git: an
>> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
>> >>
>> >> Julian
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is normal
>> >> that
>> >>> links are broken.
>> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we should
>> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid confusion.
>> >>>
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Stamatis
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda <and...@sereda.cc>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
>> >> uploaded.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Meanwhile here are the release notes:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have
>> missed
>> >>>> something.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan <hy...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> +1 (binding)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Environment:
>> >>>>> Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
>> >>>>> - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
>> >>>>> - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022 CALCITE-4115
>> >>>>> CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
>> changes,
>> >>>>> those can be updated after release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> - Haisheng
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda <and...@sereda.cc> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hi all,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
>> >>>>>> candidate 0.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You can read the release notes here:
>> >>>>>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The commit to be voted upon:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Tag:
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
>> >>>>>> (revision 40922)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> RAT report:
>> >>>>>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Site preview is here:
>> >>>>>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
>> >>>>>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
>> >>>>>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> >>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
>> >>>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> N.B.
>> >>>>>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the
>> tests
>> >>>>>> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
>> >>>>>> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>> at
>> >>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
>> >>>>>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the
>> release
>> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Here is my vote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>

Reply via email to