Thanks, Stamatis. All seems to be working now.

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Andrei,
>
> I uploaded your key to the file. Please check.
>
> Normally you don't need to be in the PMC to have access to the svn repo.
> I don't know what went wrong and you were not able to push it through.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS> ? I don't have
> > permissions for that svn repo.
> >
> > I've sent an email to [email protected].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrei.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to
> > > validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andrei.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59 AM Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Andrei,
> > >>>
> > >>> Your key’s signature appears in KEYS because you signed Stamatis’s
> key.
> > >>> But your key isn’t actually defined in the file. After I imported the
> > file,
> > >>> your key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg.
> > >>>
> > >>> Julian
> > >>>
> > >>> > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > 
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> > before
> > >>> the
> > >>> > release announcement.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I see my signing key in KEYS
> > >>> > $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS
> |
> > >>> grep
> > >>> > sereda
> > >>> > sig          C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> SIGNING
> > >>> KEY) <
> > >>> > [email protected]>
> > >>> > sig          C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19  Andrei Sereda (CODE
> SIGNING
> > >>> KEY) <
> > >>> > [email protected]>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> git:
> > an
> > >>> > empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > >>> > Yes you're right. I presume you're still OK with RC0 (judging by
> your
> > >>> +1) ?
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:53 AM Julian Hyde <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> +1 (binding)
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Checked keys, hashes, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; compiled and ran
> > tests
> > >>> on
> > >>> >> Ubuntu/JDK 14; ran RAT.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it
> > before
> > >>> the
> > >>> >> release announcement.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> * There are several files in the source distro that are not in
> git:
> > an
> > >>> >> empty ‘arrow’ directory, and a non-empty ‘licenses’ directory.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Julian
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 2:33 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>> >> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> If I remember well the site preview is not implemented so it is
> > >>> normal
> > >>> >> that
> > >>> >>> links are broken.
> > >>> >>> I don't know if this has changed recently but if not I think we
> > >>> should
> > >>> >>> remove the site preview links from the draft email to avoid
> > >>> confusion.
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> Best,
> > >>> >>> Stamatis
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>>> Yes I'm aware that for some reason site artifact wasn't built /
> > >>> >> uploaded.
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> Meanwhile here are the release notes:
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.25.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> I'll double-check the build script / instructions, maybe I have
> > >>> missed
> > >>> >>>> something.
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Haisheng Yuan <
> [email protected]>
> > >>> >> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> Environment:
> > >>> >>>>> Mac OS X 10.15.1 , JDK 1.8.0_162
> > >>> >>>>> - Ran unit tests (./gradlew build), OK
> > >>> >>>>> - Checked release notes, CALCITE-4156, CALCITE-4022
> CALCITE-4115
> > >>> >>>>> CALCITE-4129 CALCITE-4111 are not part of Build and test suite
> > >>> changes,
> > >>> >>>>> those can be updated after release.
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> - Haisheng
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>> On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>> >>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release
> > >>> >>>>>> candidate 0.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> You can read the release notes here:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> The commit to be voted upon:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Its hash is 68b02dfd4af15bc94a91a0cd2a30655d04439555
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Tag:
> > >>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.25.0-rc0
> > >>> >>>>>> (revision 40922)
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> RAT report:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/rat/rat-report.txt
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Site preview is here:
> > >>> >>>>>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> JavaDoc API preview is here:
> > >>> >>>>>> https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/api
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> a5e61bd93657a274ee8a1d1ecbde68e3e471fd27b85bea179991b372f094ae3cdf692672245506a08b996534f9136be26569de81af2bb7d8f026799313957e87
> > >>> >>>>>> *apache-calcite-1.25.0-src.tar.gz
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1097/org/apache/calcite/
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > >>> >>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sereda.asc
> > >>> >>>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> N.B.
> > >>> >>>>>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run
> the
> > >>> tests
> > >>> >>>>>> using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose,
> then
> > >>> run
> > >>> >>>>>> "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite
> 1.25.0.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a
> majority
> > >>> of at
> > >>> >>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.25.0
> > >>> >>>>>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the
> > >>> release
> > >>> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> Here is my vote:
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding)
> > >>> >>>>>>
> > >>> >>>>>
> > >>> >>>>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to