Fixing the problem in the vote email previously noted by xiong duan:

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.29.0

+1

Downloaded, checked hashes and signatures; compared files with git; checked 
LICENSE, NOTICE; ensured no binaries in the tarball; built on Ubuntu Linux, JDK 
15 and Gradle 7.2 (per howto.md).

Other remarks:
* howto.md should say Gradle 7.3 (since that’s out current Gradle version) but 
says 7.2
* I guess we now support JDK 16 and 17? According to the release notes, we only 
go up to JDK 15.
* The commit message of 
https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e
 
<https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e>
 should not end in ‘.’. 
* The release notes need significant work:
  * For contributors, list only names (not email addresses), remove duplicates, 
and end each line with ‘,’ (last line with ‘.’)
  * Change lines should not end in ‘,’
  * Add a ‘New features’ section
  * In the change lines, manually put backticks around references such as 
ARRAY_CONCAT and SqlBasicCall 
  * Use editorial discretion to make the release notes clearer. For example, it 
is confusing that the release notes includes 'Revert Elasticsearch to 7.10.2’ 
without mentioning the previous upgrade. I would say ‘Upgrade Elasticsearch to 
7.10.2’. Also omit the ‘ Upgrade log4j2 version to 2.15.0’ and 'Upgrade log4j2 
version to 2.16.0’ lines, because they are superseded.
  * 'Build gives lots of 'Execution optimizations have been disabled' 
warnings,’ should be in ‘Build’ section
  * We need more of a ‘headline’ than 'This release comes two months after 
1.28.0, contains contributions from 23 authors, and resolves 47 issues’ . I 
would definitely mention the upgrade to log4j2. Others at your discretion.

Julian


> On Dec 20, 2021, at 5:27 PM, Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.29.0, release
> candidate 0.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> 
> You can read the release notes here:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.29.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> 
> The commit to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e
> 
> Its hash is cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e
> 
> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.29.0-rc0/
> (revision 51667)
> 
> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> 7a59a30d0cab7b5edfcb71b960fc932de77b92f6e5863a99c721b61915805933e717a209dca880e46092d595920ba24485474f0c3b6715d152c900c0d95348b3
> *apache-calcite-1.29.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1127/org/apache/calcite/
> 
> 
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/amaliujia.asc
> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> 
> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build" (requires an
> appropriate Gradle/JDK installation).
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.29.0.
> 
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.27.0
> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

Reply via email to