Hi Julian,

What is the proper way to fix release note/documentation
suggestions given RC0 is under voting (I guess that does not require a RC1
cut)?

just push a new commit later to fix those things?

-Rui

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 8:29 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fixing the problem in the vote email previously noted by xiong duan:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.29.0
>
> +1
>
> Downloaded, checked hashes and signatures; compared files with git;
> checked LICENSE, NOTICE; ensured no binaries in the tarball; built on
> Ubuntu Linux, JDK 15 and Gradle 7.2 (per howto.md).
>
> Other remarks:
> * howto.md should say Gradle 7.3 (since that’s out current Gradle version)
> but says 7.2
> * I guess we now support JDK 16 and 17? According to the release notes, we
> only go up to JDK 15.
> * The commit message of
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e
> <
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e>
> should not end in ‘.’.
> * The release notes need significant work:
>   * For contributors, list only names (not email addresses), remove
> duplicates, and end each line with ‘,’ (last line with ‘.’)
>   * Change lines should not end in ‘,’
>   * Add a ‘New features’ section
>   * In the change lines, manually put backticks around references such as
> ARRAY_CONCAT and SqlBasicCall
>   * Use editorial discretion to make the release notes clearer. For
> example, it is confusing that the release notes includes 'Revert
> Elasticsearch to 7.10.2’ without mentioning the previous upgrade. I would
> say ‘Upgrade Elasticsearch to 7.10.2’. Also omit the ‘ Upgrade log4j2
> version to 2.15.0’ and 'Upgrade log4j2 version to 2.16.0’ lines, because
> they are superseded.
>   * 'Build gives lots of 'Execution optimizations have been disabled'
> warnings,’ should be in ‘Build’ section
>   * We need more of a ‘headline’ than 'This release comes two months after
> 1.28.0, contains contributions from 23 authors, and resolves 47 issues’ . I
> would definitely mention the upgrade to log4j2. Others at your discretion.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 2021, at 5:27 PM, Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.29.0, release
> > candidate 0.
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >
> > You can read the release notes here:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.29.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> >
> > The commit to be voted upon:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e
> >
> > Its hash is cbfe0609edcc4a843d71497f159e3687a834119e
> >
> > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.29.0-rc0/
> > (revision 51667)
> >
> > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> >
> 7a59a30d0cab7b5edfcb71b960fc932de77b92f6e5863a99c721b61915805933e717a209dca880e46092d595920ba24485474f0c3b6715d152c900c0d95348b3
> > *apache-calcite-1.29.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1127/org/apache/calcite/
> >
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/amaliujia.asc
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> >
> > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build" (requires an
> > appropriate Gradle/JDK installation).
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.29.0.
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.27.0
> > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>

Reply via email to