Hi Ruben,

Thanks for your suggestion. Let's go ahead with it.

Best,
Liya Fan


Ruben Q L <[email protected]> 于2022年3月8日周二 07:49写道:

> Hello Liya Fan,
>
> please be aware that, normally, when there are issues ONLY on the release
> notes, we do not require a new RC (they can be amended afterwards with a
> commit right after the release).
> So, I'd say that for the moment we can just cancel RC0 vote (an email
> "[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite1.30.0 (release candidate 0)" should
> be sent to make it official), and keep RC1 vote open.
>
> Best,
> Ruben
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:34 PM Fan Liya <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback. I will prepare another build, after addressing
> > these issues.
> >
> > Best,
> > Liya Fan
> >
> >
> > Julian Hyde <[email protected]> 于2022年3月8日周二 04:50写道:
> >
> > > Liya, in the next iteration can you go back to the usual sections e.g
> > > “Bug-fixes, API changes and minor enhancements”. Also remove the “Fix”
> > > prefix from messages.
> > >
> > > Quite a few cases, e.g “ Fix the problem that JDBC adapter incorrectly
> > > adds ORDER BY columns to the SELECT list of generated SQL query” are in
> > the
> > > gray area between bug and missing feature, and using the original
> message
> > > helps people make their own decision.
> > >
> > > I also think there’s value in putting changes to build and test in a
> > > separate section, as we used to do. But please move my “Fluent test
> > > fixtures” into the “new features” section - because it is a major new
> > > feature.
> > >
> > > Julian
> > >
> > > > On Mar 6, 2022, at 10:31 PM, Francis Chuang <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks so much Liya! Please cancel this vote by sending a [CANCEL]
> > > message as well, to formalize the cancellation of this vote.
> > > >
> > > > Francis
> > > >
> > > >> On 7/03/2022 5:27 pm, Fan Liya wrote:
> > > >> After some investigation, I could not resolve the 404 issue of the
> > > commit
> > > >> link (In my computer, it is not 404, but an error with XML format).
> > > >> So I have created a new build, which has resolved all the above
> issues
> > > >> (according to the test on my local computer).
> > > >> Let's start another vote based on the new build. Thanks.
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Liya Fan
> > > >> Fan Liya <[email protected]> 于2022年3月7日周一 09:53写道:
> > > >>> Thanks for your feedback, Francis.
> > > >>> I will check.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>> Liya Fan
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Francis Chuang <[email protected]> 于2022年3月7日周一 09:36写道:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hey Liya,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks for being RM for this release.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Can you check the commit to be voted upon?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=28aacc0bbccfbcd821fece72ae3d92f6c1db8a5e
> > > >>>> returns a 404
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Also, tag calcite-1.30.0-rc0 points to a39b9bf
> > > >>>> (
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/releases/tag/calcite-1.30.0-rc0
> > ),
> > > >>>> which does not seem to be in the Calcite repository, see:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/a39b9bf8b1cbab8f4462c41f6b4506753f859f96
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks!
> > > >>>> Francis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 5/03/2022 8:56 pm, Fan Liya wrote:
> > > >>>>> Hi all,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.30.0, release
> > > >>>>> candidate 0.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> You can read the release notes here:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.30.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The commit to be voted upon:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=28aacc0bbccfbcd821fece72ae3d92f6c1db8a5e
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Its hash is 28aacc0bbccfbcd821fece72ae3d92f6c1db8a5e
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tag:
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.30.0-rc0
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.30.0-rc0
> > > >>>>> (revision 52873)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> 339b279426abfc09a73b0daf94479127aa469b1cd3fa1b1cf0842f57d64daf0e080d4e85ccdd2d32032ed424a39388790743adf2aec869480612e37003eabfc5
> > > >>>>> *apache-calcite-1.30.0-src.tar.gz
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1148/org/apache/calcite/
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/COMMITTER_ID.asc
> > > >>>>> https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build"
> > > >>>>> (requires an appropriate Gradle/JDK installation)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.30.0.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
> of
> > at
> > > >>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.30.0
> > > >>>>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the
> > release
> > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Here is my vote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>> Liya Fan
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to