+1 for dropping them. We should do this for both calcite and
calcite-avatica (there shouldn't be any dangling branches for
calcite-avatica-go).
On 23/01/2023 7:13 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
Hi all,
Apart from the main, site, and possibly one or two other branches, all the
rest are not used by anyone unless I am missing something.
Many of them (branch-X.Y) were generated during past releases but this
pattern stopped some time ago.
It is not a big deal keeping them around but it can be confusing for new
comers (.e.g., we still have the master branch around there) and tools
operating at repo level.
The most recent example is the INFRA team informing us about the use of
Travis in our repos I assume due to the presence of .travis.yml file in
branch-X.Y branches.
Are there any reasons for keeping them around? If not how about dropping
them.
Best,
Stamatis
