+1 for the cleanup. Best, Chunwei
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:05 AM Benchao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, thanks for the effort. > > Sergey Nuyanzin <[email protected]> 于2023年1月23日周一 20:02写道： > > > +1 for cleanup > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:53 AM Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 for the cleanup. > > > > > > Best, > > > Ruben > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 7:27 AM Alessandro Solimando < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 from me as well, keeping unused branches around is only confusing. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Alessandro > > > > > > > > On Sun 22 Jan 2023, 22:58 Julian Hyde, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > There’s probably a tag for each release but let’s make sure before > we > > > > drop > > > > > the branch. If any branch just has a ‘prepare for next iteration’ > > > commit > > > > > following the release tag I’m fine dropping that commit. > > > > > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 22, 2023, at 1:05 PM, Francis Chuang < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for dropping them. We should do this for both calcite and > > > > > calcite-avatica (there shouldn't be any dangling branches for > > > > > calcite-avatica-go). > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23/01/2023 7:13 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > > > >> Apart from the main, site, and possibly one or two other > branches, > > > all > > > > > the > > > > > >> rest are not used by anyone unless I am missing something. > > > > > >> Many of them (branch-X.Y) were generated during past releases > but > > > this > > > > > >> pattern stopped some time ago. > > > > > >> It is not a big deal keeping them around but it can be confusing > > for > > > > new > > > > > >> comers (.e.g., we still have the master branch around there) and > > > tools > > > > > >> operating at repo level. > > > > > >> The most recent example is the INFRA team informing us about the > > use > > > > of > > > > > >> Travis in our repos I assume due to the presence of .travis.yml > > file > > > > in > > > > > >> branch-X.Y branches. > > > > > >> Are there any reasons for keeping them around? If not how about > > > > dropping > > > > > >> them. > > > > > >> Best, > > > > > >> Stamatis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Sergey > > > > > -- > > Best, > Benchao Li >
