Hi, Benchao Is the main branch still frozen?
I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released. [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/3157408a127de0d5c1d6b440bd2086f96f4f91ba On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:59, Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> wrote: > The release note PR is now available for review: > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3505 > > Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道： > > > > Hi devs, > > > > All the issues targeted for 1.36.0 have been resolved, I'll start the > > release process now. Therefore main branch is in code freeze until > > further notice. > > > > Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月3日周五 10:50写道： > > > > > > @Mihai @Julian The only left issue is 5884 now, can we merge it and > > > start the releasing process? > > > > > > LakeShen <shenleifight...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道： > > > > > > > > Hi Itiel, > > > > > > > > I have reviewd the https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and > left one > > > > comments > > > > > > > > Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道： > > > > > > > > > Mihai, > > > > > I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in > 1.36.0 > > > > > > > > > > Itiel, > > > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and > even > > > > > with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it > merged > > > > > in 1.36.0 > > > > > > > > > > Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes. > > > > > > I expected it would be easy to get it in. > > > > > > But we can leave it for later. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mihai > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM > > > > > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and > CALCITE-4455, > > > > > > I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Other three issues look promising to be merged soon, then I'll > start > > > > > > the release process after they are merged. > > > > > > > > > > > > Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月31日周二 02:31写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just merged CALCITE-{129,6052}. Five left. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 7:22 AM, Ran Tao <chucheng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The expected release time at the end of the month seems to > be coming > > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days > (almost > > > > > ready): > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #2. Last update exceeded 2 days > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #3. Last update exceeded 7 days > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Ran Tao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jiajun Xie <jiajunbernou...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月28日周六 > 13:34写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi, all: > > > > > > > >> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues > has been > > > > > someone > > > > > > > >> reviewed. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.36.0 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> - Some issues are currently being reviewed. > > > > > > > >> That's great! Thank you all for your efforts. > > > > > > > >> - Some issues have not been updated for a long time. > > > > > > > >> If anyone is willing to continue the review, I believe they > should > > > > > be > > > > > > > >> resolved soon. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days: > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> #2. Last update exceeded 2 days > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> #4. Last update exceeded 14 days > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:40, Benchao Li < > libenc...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> Thanks Mihai for the quick response, I'll take a look at > the PR. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道： > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should > > > > > collectively > > > > > > > >>> fix them. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes > > > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990, but > does not > > > > > include > > > > > > > >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well > for the > > > > > tests > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR: > > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes > > > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but > should be > > > > > > > >> amended > > > > > > > >>> to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Mihai > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> ________________________________ > > > > > > > >>>> From: Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> > > > > > > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM > > > > > > > >>>> To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > > > > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> A quick update on the current status for issues targeted > 1.36.0 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of > October is > > > > > > > >>> approaching. > > > > > > > >>>> Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues > in #1. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> #1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to > be > > > > > merged > > > > > > > >>> shortly > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5860 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6011 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5949 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6038 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> #2. Issues has been reviewed, and needs another reviewer > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5984 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5825 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5826 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4455 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6042 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> #3. PR is ready, no reviewer yet > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052 > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-129 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> #4. blocker issues status > > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 is > marked > > > > > blocked > > > > > > > >>>> by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921 > now. > > > > > > > >>>> Both issues have a PR, but proposed to have a more > thorough > > > > > solution. > > > > > > > >>>> I'll keep an eye on them closely. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Ran Tao <chucheng...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月18日周三 18:37写道： > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi, community. > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that > calcite's MAP > > > > > > > >>> SubQuery > > > > > > > >>>>> doesn't work, > > > > > > > >>>>> considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe > we can > > > > > fix it > > > > > > > >> in > > > > > > > >>>>> 1.36. > > > > > > > >>>>> The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review > it. many > > > > > > > >>> thanks. > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6041 > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Best Regards, > > > > > > > >>>>> Ran Tao > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道： > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last > release [1] > > > > > and > > > > > > > >>>>>> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch. > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> As usual, according to our Jira dashboard [2] and > Github [3], > > > > > there > > > > > > > >>>>>> are many pending issues that could / should be part of > the > > > > > release. > > > > > > > >>>>>> I'd propose to make a collective effort to try to clean > up our > > > > > 1.36 > > > > > > > >>>>>> backlog and merge the PRs which are in a good state. I'd > > > > > propose to > > > > > > > >>>>>> aim for **end of October** to release 1.36.0, this will > give us > > > > > > > >> about > > > > > > > >>>>>> 20 days to clean up pending PRs for next version. What > do you > > > > > > > >> think? > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> According to [4], the following release managers would > be: > > > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.36.0 Benchao Li > > > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.37.0 Sergey Nuyanzin > > > > > > > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> So I'm supposed to be the release manager for 1.36.0 > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> And contributors, if you have any work that is in good > shape and > > > > > > > >> want > > > > > > > >>>>>> to be included in 1.36.0, please mark the fixVersion to > 1.36.0, > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > >>>>>> will inform the release manager, and we'll try our best > to get > > > > > it > > > > > > > >> in. > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5990[5] is marked as a blocker since it's > introduced by > > > > > > > >>>>>> CALCITE-5843[6], could @Mihai help to double check > whether it > > > > > is a > > > > > > > >>>>>> expected change, and we need to fix it within 1.36.0? > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> [1] > https://calcite.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-35-0 > > > > > > > >>>>>> [2] > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950 > > > > > > > >>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > > > > > > > >>>>>> [4] > > > > > > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/tm3t42qvpq3db24xtd2g468ofv83l6hk > > > > > > > >>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990 > > > > > > > >>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5843 > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > >>>>>> Benchao Li > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Best, > > > > > > > >>>> Benchao Li > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Best, > > > > > > > >>> Benchao Li > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Benchao Li > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Benchao Li > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best, > > > Benchao Li > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best, > > Benchao Li > > > > -- > > Best, > Benchao Li >
