Hi Guilluame,

I played a bit more and I realised that if from commit above I just remove
one line with assert (assert map != null)
then ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException disappears

same for current main branch, if I remove all lines from SqlFunctions with
assert (now there are 3 such lines) then
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException disappears

Thus,  it does not look like a Calcite issue, more like a problem on ASM
side
please correct me if I'm wrong

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:33 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> i follow the procedure described here
> https://calcite.apache.org/docs/howto.html#making-a-release-candidate
> started
> btw I played a bit with git bisect and it shows that the issue
>
>     java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 65536 out of bounds for 
> length 297        at 
> org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.readLabel(ClassReader.java:2695)        at 
> org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.createLabel(ClassReader.java:2711)
>
> started appearing after this commit
>
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/bcf6bd8577b25c563b1c597c70704594a18ca1a3
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:01 PM Guillaume Masse
> <masse.guilla...@narrative.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> thanks for trying that update
>>
>> I confirm I have the same issue with your release at
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1231/org/apache/calcite/
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/MasseGuillaume/asm-remapper-bug/commit/852e4cd246d278db8acf5e997a54619bc4f85fc7
>>
>> This rules out one of my hypothesis on the java build version.
>>
>> Can you point me to the release procedure you are using? I saw
>> https://calcite.apache.org/develop/#contributing is there more precise
>> steps?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 3:27 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I repeated same procedure with jdk1.8u412
>> > here you can find the jars
>> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1231/org/apache/calcite/
>> > it looks like asm-remapper gives the same result...
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:41 PM Guillaume Masse
>> > <masse.guilla...@narrative.io.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If you take a look at
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.openlogic.com/openjdk-downloads?field_java_parent_version_target_id=416&field_operating_system_target_id=426&field_architecture_target_id=391&field_java_package_target_id=All
>> > >
>> > > The most recent release is 8u412-b08
>> > >
>> > > If it follows more or less the openjdk schedule:
>> > >
>> > > https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/jdk8u/Main
>> > >
>> > > *Most recent and past release details:*
>> > >
>> > >    - 8u412-b08 (GA), April 16th 2024 [Release <
>> > https://bit.ly/openjdk8u412
>> > > >]
>> > >    [Tag <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u412-ga>]
>> [
>> > >    Binaries
>> > >    <
>> > >
>> https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u412-b08>
>> > >    ]
>> > >    - 8u402-b06 (GA), January 16th 2024 [Release
>> > >    <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u402>] [Tag
>> > >    <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u402-ga>]
>> > [Binaries
>> > >    <
>> > >
>> https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u402-b06>
>> > >    ]
>> > >    - 8u392-b08 (GA), October 17th 2023 [Release
>> > >    <https://bit.ly/openjdk8u392>] [Tag
>> > >    <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u392-ga>]
>> > [Binaries
>> > >    <
>> > >
>> https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u392-b08>
>> > >    ]
>> > >    - 8u382-b05 (GA), July 18th 2023 [Release <
>> > https://bit.ly/openjdk8u382
>> > > >]
>> > >    [Tag <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u382-ga>]
>> [
>> > >    Binaries
>> > >    <
>> > >
>> https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u382-b05>
>> > >    ]
>> > >    - 8u372-b07 (GA), April 18th 2023 [Release <
>> > https://bit.ly/openjdk8u372
>> > > >]
>> > >    [Tag <https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u/releases/tag/jdk8u372-ga>]
>> [
>> > >    Binaries
>> > >    <
>> > >
>> https://github.com/adoptium/temurin8-binaries/releases/tag/jdk8u372-b07>
>> > >    ]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > This means your java version is from April 2023. Can you try to update
>> > your
>> > > system to the latest build 8u412-b08 and publish the jarfile
>> somewhere I
>> > > can test ?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:25 PM Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks for testing Guillaume
>> > > >
>> > > > >Sergey can you give me all the details about your build environment
>> > so I
>> > > > >can reproduce that bytecode?
>> > > > >OS / java --version
>> > > > yep, sure
>> > > > Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS,
>> > > > 1.8.0_372-372 (OpenLogic-OpenJDK 25.372-b07)
>> > > >
>> > > > I will also try to look at it with my set up and the info  you've
>> > > provided
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:03 PM Guillaume Masse
>> > > > <masse.guilla...@narrative.io.invalid> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > -1 (not binding)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The bytecode of classfile
>> > org/apache/calcite/runtime/SqlFunctions.class
>> > > > is
>> > > > > invalid (and only this classfile)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I tested all class files from the following artifacts:
>> > > > > calcite-core-1.37.0.jar
>> > > > > calcite-linq4j-1.37.0.jar
>> > > > > avatica-core-1.25.0.jar
>> > > > > avatica-metrics-1.25.0.jar
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This will prevent bytecode tools like asm (https://asm.ow2.io/)
>> from
>> > > > > transforming calcite bytecode (for example shading a dependency).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > See
>> > > > > https://gitlab.ow2.org/asm/asm/-/issues/318008
>> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nrt4ysoc14p20sq23z744jyfqh1bznyh
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To reproduce
>> > > > > https://github.com/MasseGuillaume/asm-remapper-bug
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sergey can you give me all the details about your build
>> environment
>> > so
>> > > I
>> > > > > can reproduce that bytecode?
>> > > > > OS / java --version
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I do not have the root cause of the issue.
>> > > > > I suspect it's related to import
>> > > > > org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 10:56 AM Sergey Nuyanzin <
>> > snuyan...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The issue CALCITE-6390 with failing of Arrow Adapter tests on
>> > Windows
>> > > > > while
>> > > > > > building from source is fixed.
>> > > > > > Thanks  a lot to Caican Can for highlighting the issue
>> > > > > > Stamatis for quick PR
>> > > > > > and Ruben and Alessandro for the review!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.37.0, release
>> > > > > > candidate 4.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > You can read the release notes here:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.37.0-rc4/site/_docs/history.md
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The commit to be voted upon:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=044db3d72ee53c1a82ce68b0c2a9b4f0bed81f18
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Its hash is 044db3d72ee53c1a82ce68b0c2a9b4f0bed81f18
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Tag:
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/calcite-1.37.0-rc4
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>> > > > > >
>> > > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.37.0-rc4
>> > > > > > (revision 68857)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> a6ae7ea1ebbab3e5b723122c9517412d74b6bccba9fb41d360f7c2262ed7f26e5a4cc861a711d4813d27d72a0ffd086ae3a9175abc3c874b079137c84d13f83a
>> > > > > > *apache-calcite-1.37.0-src.tar.gz
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1230/org/apache/calcite/
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > > > > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/snuyanzin.asc
>> > > > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "gradle build"
>> > > > > > (requires an appropriate Gradle/JDK installation)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.37.0.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority
>> of
>> > at
>> > > > > > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.37.0
>> > > > > > [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the
>> > release
>> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Here is my vote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > > > Sergey
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > > Sergey
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> > Sergey
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey
>


-- 
Best regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to