The only thing that would need to be private would be particular vulnerabilities where there is not yet a public fix. In my opinion, it’s sufficient to report the increased activity due to vulnerabilities in the last quarter (let’s call it the Mythos era) and give credit to the community members doing the work.
> On Jul 4, 2026, at 6:08 PM, Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I will add a paragraph about the security vulnerabilities in the report. > > I am not sure whether this paragraph can be yet shared on the dev mailing > list, since I believe these vulnerabilities are not yet public. > > I will mention the response to the vulnerabilities, which will be fixed in > the next release, and the security threat model that is currently under > review. > > (I will also fix the typo in my draft, pointed out by readers.) > > Thank you, > Mihai > > > ________________________________ > From: Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2026 8:42 AM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Draft board report for 2026 Q3 > > PS Thank you to Stamatis for driving our response to CVEs. It’s critical work > but doesn’t get much thanks because, by necessity, the work is not done in > public. I don’t know whether we have any numbers to share, but CVE activity > deserves a mention in the report. > > Julian > >> On Jul 2, 2026, at 08:34, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I agree with your analysis - an uptick in contributions. Thank you to our >> reviewers, especially top reviewers mihaibudiu, xuzifu666, xiedeyantu, for >> keeping those contributions flowing. >> >> The reason that we can accept contributions is our architecture - it’s easy >> to add things without other things breaking. Please, everyone, let’s think >> about ways to keep on improving the architecture. >> >> Julian >> >>> On Jul 2, 2026, at 06:51, Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Mihai for preparing the report. >>> I agree with Zhen, I think [email protected] had a 84% *increase* >>> (not decrease) in this period. >>> Apart from that, +1! >>> >>> Ruben >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 11:40 AM Francis Chuang <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1, great work, Mihai! >>>> >>>>>> On 2/07/2026 7:41 pm, Alessandro Solimando wrote: >>>>>> seems very actively engaged. We are seeing a >>>>>> substantial increase in traffic, no doubt due to the barrier of entry >>>>>> to contributions being lowered by AI tools. >>>> >>>>
