PS Thank you to Stamatis for driving our response to CVEs. It’s critical work but doesn’t get much thanks because, by necessity, the work is not done in public. I don’t know whether we have any numbers to share, but CVE activity deserves a mention in the report.
Julian > On Jul 2, 2026, at 08:34, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with your analysis - an uptick in contributions. Thank you to our > reviewers, especially top reviewers mihaibudiu, xuzifu666, xiedeyantu, for > keeping those contributions flowing. > > The reason that we can accept contributions is our architecture - it’s easy > to add things without other things breaking. Please, everyone, let’s think > about ways to keep on improving the architecture. > > Julian > >> On Jul 2, 2026, at 06:51, Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Mihai for preparing the report. >> I agree with Zhen, I think [email protected] had a 84% *increase* >> (not decrease) in this period. >> Apart from that, +1! >> >> Ruben >> >> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 11:40 AM Francis Chuang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1, great work, Mihai! >>> >>>>> On 2/07/2026 7:41 pm, Alessandro Solimando wrote: >>>>> seems very actively engaged. We are seeing a >>>>> substantial increase in traffic, no doubt due to the barrier of entry >>>>> to contributions being lowered by AI tools. >>> >>>
