After digging, the problem seems to be on the Hive side, not Calcite; I'll have the fix in the next few hours.
Thus, +1 to go on with the release. Thanks, Jesús On 8/16/15, 10:12 AM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected]> wrote: >I believe there is still a problem with an infinite loop while getting >some >metadata. And Jesus has been tied up with other issues for the past week. > >Since this problem only seems to affect Hive and this release is seriously >overdue I think we should release Calcite as it stands. > >Jesus, what do you think? > >Julian > >On Friday, August 14, 2015, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ping... @Jesus and @Julian, are things looking good on the Hive side >>for a >> release? >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > So, it looks like 833 is merged and Julian pushed a snapshot. If >> > everything looks good, I should probably propose a release. Is >> everything >> > looking good on each of the frameworks? >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks, Julian! >> >> >> >> I think that's the last regression issue for 1.4.0 release from Drill >> >> side. >> >> With Calcite-833 patch, all the regression suites run successfully. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Since 833 is a regression, yes, we can get it into the 1.4. I have >> added >> >> > some comments that I would like Sean to address. >> >> > >> >> > > On Aug 10, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Jinfeng Ni <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > Forgot to include the link to the JIRA of CALCITE-833 [1]. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-833 >> >> > > >> >> > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Jinfeng Ni >><[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> The patch of DRILL-822 fixed the regressions we previously saw >>on >> >> Drill >> >> > >> side. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> There is one remaining regression in Drill's regression suite, >>for >> >> which >> >> > >> Sean has opened JIRA CALCITE-833 [1] and submitted a patch. >>Can we >> >> get >> >> > the >> >> > >> patch of CALCITE-833 merged into 1.4.0 release? >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> [1] >>https://github.com/hsuanyi/incubator-calcite/tree/CALCITE-833 >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >>> I have added 3 commits to master: Jesus' fix to 826, and >>Milinda's >> >> fix >> >> > >>> to 822, and Jinfeng's test case for 822. I think this fixes the >> main >> >> > >>> issues that were causing regression in Drill and Hive. I've >> created >> >> a >> >> > >>> new snapshot based on the latest master. >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> Can those teams please re-test and let this list know how those >> >> tests >> >> > >>> went? >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> A reminder that no other commits should go into master until >>the >> >> > >>> release is out. (Probably around 8/20.) I have been applying >> patches >> >> > >>> to my personal julianhyde/new-master branch[2], and you can >> consider >> >> > >>> this a preview of how the master branch will look right after >>the >> >> > >>> release. If you need the latest and greatest and can stand the >> >> > >>> occasional rebase, you're welcome to develop on that branch. >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> Julian >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> [1] >> >> > >>> >> >> > >> >> >> >>https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/commit/e827bf0a2e410e5613dcf4 >>07778e4f5735e75c1c >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> [2] >> https://github.com/julianhyde/incubator-calcite/tree/new-master >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>> +1 to let Jacques take vacation >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> There's no urgency to get the release out. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> The only problem, and it's a minor one, is that master branch >>is >> >> > >>>> closed for check-ins until the release vote completes (August >> 22nd >> >> > >>>> even in the best case scenario). We won't have anywhere to >> >> integrate >> >> > >>>> changes that are to go into 1.5. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> One solution is to create a "branch-1.4" branch now, re-open >> master >> >> > >>>> for commits, and release from branch-1.4. But I'm not keen on >> that. >> >> > >>>> We'd have to start fixing bugs in two places, and the fixes >>will >> >> have >> >> > >>>> different hashes. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> I suggest creating a "future" branch and start committing >>changes >> >> for >> >> > >>>> the 1.5 release to that. Release 1.4 will be made from the >> "master" >> >> > >>>> branch. After the release, we will rebase "future" onto it. >>(And >> >> yes, >> >> > >>>> commit hashes may change during that rebase.) >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> Julian >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Ted Dunning < >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>> Speaking as a guy monitoring the mailing list while on >> vacation, I >> >> > >>> suggest >> >> > >>>>> that the delay is a good thing. >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> Go away. Have fun. Relax. Chill. >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Jacques Nadeau < >> >> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> Hey Guys, >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> I'm leaving on vacation shortly. I was originally hoping >>to be >> >> all >> >> > >>> the way >> >> > >>>>>> through the release before the vacation. Then I was hoping >>for >> >> > being >> >> > >>> most >> >> > >>>>>> of the way through the release. It now looks like the first >> vote >> >> > >>> probably >> >> > >>>>>> won't have started before my vacation. I can run the >>release >> >> > process >> >> > >>>>>> during my vacation but I'd rather not (also a little worried >> >> about >> >> > >>> upload >> >> > >>>>>> speed). I suggest that we simply delay the release for a >>week >> >> and a >> >> > >>> half >> >> > >>>>>> (trying to get these issues solved during that time). Then >>I >> can >> >> > run >> >> > >>> the >> >> > >>>>>> release when I'm back to full speed on the 12th. >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> Thoughts? >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> thanks, >> >> > >>>>>> Jacques >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Jesus Camachorodriguez < >> >> > >>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> We seem to have an assertion problem in line 394 in >> >> > RelFieldTrimmer. >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> assert newProject.getClass() == project.getClass(); >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> The new project is created with the provided factory, thus >>is >> of >> >> > >>> type >> >> > >>>>>>> HiveProject (this is correct); however, the project object >>is >> a >> >> > >>>>>>> LogicalProject. I need to track the plan changes to see >>when >> >> this >> >> > >>>>>>> LogicalProject is created. >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> More to come... >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> > >>>>>>> Jesús >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> On 7/31/15, 8:39 AM, "Jesus Camachorodriguez" >> >> > >>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> Jacques, >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> We run QA after the fix for CALCITE-821 went in, and I'm >> >> seeing 59 >> >> > >>> test >> >> > >>>>>>>> fails in Hive. I'm analyzing them right now... >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> I will keep you posted. >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> > >>>>>>>> Jesús >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> On 7/31/15, 3:36 AM, "Jacques Nadeau" <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> Jesus, how are things looking after the new snapshot? >> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2015 2:17 PM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> Yes, I just pushed a new snapshot. It's based on >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/commit/1580bd0fec62d836c9870 >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> e >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> dc339b0ab99d909cad >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> . >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jesus Camachorodriguez >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >>wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for fixing it so quickly Julian. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sure, I'd like to do that. Is the new SNAPSHOT with the >> new >> >> > >>> fixes >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> already >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> created? >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesús >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/29/15, 10:55 PM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The fix is checked in. Can you restart the Hive tests >>and >> >> let >> >> > >>> us >> >> > >>>>>> know >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> when they have passed? Or maybe you don’t think it >> >> necessary >> >> > >>> to run >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> the >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hive tests? >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Julian >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 29, 2015, at 11:10 AM, Jesus Camachorodriguez >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot Julian. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm checking it right now; I'll update the JIRA case >> when >> >> > >>> I'm >> >> > >>>>>> done. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/29/15, 7:43 PM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesus, I have modified >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-821 >> with a >> >> > >>>>>>> suggested >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> patch. Can you see whether it works? >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Julian Hyde < >> >> > >>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking into 821 also. You're right that it was >> >> > >>> caused by >> >> > >>>>>> the >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> edit >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Frameworks.java in the fix to >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-748. >> Not >> >> > >>> sure >> >> > >>>>>> why >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change was made, I'm pretty sure it was for a good >> >> reason. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Jesus >> Camachorodriguez >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've finally been able to trigger a Hive QA run. I >> have >> >> > >>> logged >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-821 >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is making all our tests fail. We will be >> checking >> >> > >>> into >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jesús >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/29/15, 7:27 AM, "Jacques Nadeau" < >> >> > >>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Will do. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Julian Hyde >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please take a look at 741, 743, Jacques. >> >> > >>> They're >> >> > >>>>>> best >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> done >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while you're actually rolling a release. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Jacques Nadeau >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian, are you looking at 741/743 or should I >> take >> >> a >> >> > >>> look? >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Julian Hyde >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you should include 811. It adds 3 new >> >> > >>> instances >> >> > >>>>>> of a >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> rule >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not change the existing one. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe that Hive's test run has >> finished. >> >> > >>> Jesus, >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> can >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> you >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report when you have some results? >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still to do are release-related changes: >>release >> >> > >>> notes, >> >> > >>>>>> 741, >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> 743. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can do the web site after the RC. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was hoping to get Maryann's patch to 793 in, >> but >> >> I >> >> > >>> still >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> don't >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a test case, so let's defer that one. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jacques >>Nadeau >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems like everyone is happy with the >>current >> >> > >>> release. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> The >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identified by Hive looks like it was a Hive >>fix >> >> > >>> rather >> >> > >>>>>> than >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> a >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calcite >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed that Jesus committed one thing >>after >> my >> >> > >>>>>> proposed >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people feel like that is absolutely required >>in >> >> this >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> release/the >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> risk >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> involved? I'm fine including it but am >> initially >> >> > >>>>>> inclined >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> to >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave it >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next release if it isn't pressing. The >> jira: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-811 >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts? >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Julian >>Hyde < >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I¹ve tried the compile against Hive[1], >>fixed a >> >> > >>> minor >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> problem >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (related >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SortFactory), and now Jesus is going to run >>the >> >> > >>> Hive >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> suite. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques, If you¹re writing release notes you >> >> might >> >> > >>> find >> >> > >>>>>> my >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relNotes[2] >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script useful. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-11383 >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> https://github.com/julianhyde/share/blob/master/tools/relNotes >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Jacques Nadeau >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <javascript:;>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've pushed a 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT to the Apache >> >> > >>> Snapshot >> >> > >>>>>> Repo. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Framework >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owners, please try out this branch and >>report >> >> back >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> whether >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> showstopping regressions. That way we can >> work >> >> > >>> out any >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> kinks >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this to an actual release vote. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can to the current commit by adding the >> >> > >>> following >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> maven >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository to your pom.xml: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The version of the artifacts to reference >>is >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are currently based on git commit >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5cb95e644f38da1a13d6def96eeec935b650289c. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll target sending an actual release vote >>EOD >> >> > >>> Tuesday >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unless we >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional issues. >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >>
