I'm not sure when I checked that the slow test worked. I don’t think it has worked recently, and we should not make it a prerequisite of the release.
By the way, I test mongo & splunk every night (using Vladimir’s VM https://github.com/vlsi/calcite-test-dataset); I also built & ran the test suite on windows yesterday. Also, I'm going to be on vacation for 7 days. Limited email. Don’t hold the release for me. :) Julian > On Aug 23, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > I've resolved my issues. However, I'm seeing a test appear to run > forever. I've tried twice now and it seems to be that one of the test is > running forever. I've posted the jstack at [1]. Anybody have any thoughts? > > I'm running: > > mvn clean > mvn install -Dcalcite.test.db={mysql,hsqldb} -Dcalcite.test.slow=true > -Dcalcite.test.mongodb=true -Dcalcite.test.splunk=true > > @Jesus, I know you made some changes related to an infinite loop. Did you > verify that your changes worked with slow tests? > > thanks, > Jacques > > [1] https://gist.github.com/jacques-n/2607810e775e01d24264 > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The snapshot should be updated. Still working on the other issues. >> Hopefully resolve today or tomorrow. >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Jesus Camachorodriguez < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I just checked in CALCITE-850. This should be the last issue that was >>> remaining on the Hive side. >>> >>> @Jacques, could we get a new SNAPSHOT with the last commits so I could run >>> Hive QA in the meantime? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jesús >>> >>> >>> On 8/19/15, 2:12 AM, "Jacques Nadeau" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm still working on resolving 741/743. Once I get those figured out, >>>> I'll >>>> start a release vote. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have checked in Jesus' fix for >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-834 (thanks Jesus!) and >>>>> a fix for a cosmetic javadoc issue, so we're good to go. >>>>> >>>>> Julian >>>>> >>> >>> >>
