2009/7/9 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> I think it would be confusing if there is a setFault but no getFault?
> But I understand the reason when you want to use OUT for both regular
> OUT and FAULT. Where a header determine the type.
>
> As its uncommon to set a fault we could as James suggested have a
> factory method on Exchange to create a new one:
>
> Message msg = exchange.createFault();
> msg.setBody("Unknown order id " + id);
> exchange.setOut(msg);I wonder if this latter line is required? i.e. should exchange.createFault() internally set the OUT? -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
