2009/7/9 Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>: > @James, yes it would, but why have createFault()? Why not have it closer to > what it is now with > > Message getFault(); > void setFault(Message fault); // instead of create fault > (and then we won't need the setFault(boolean);)
As we're musing about having a single property called "out" which may be marked as a fault or not. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
