Development for 2.8.0 should continue without any change. Until then we cannot support cxf 2.4, slf4j, amq 5.5, etc. This patch release will provide it. If/when there will be a 2.7.2, too early to tell. We know there are users who still use older versions of camel. Ideally we should have patch releases and support older releases for a longer time.
Hadrian On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:06 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > What's the support plan of Camel 2.7.1 ? > Will we release Camel 2.7.2 some days later or just move on to Camel 2.8.x ? > > On 4/5/11 12:49 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> This probably means that we can release camel-2.7.1 before cxf-2.4.0 is out. >> Maybe you guys can make the cxf community aware of the camel changes (well, >> I guess I could do that too), so that they have a chance to test. >> >> I will create a branch off of the camel-2.7.0 tag, start applying patches >> and release a snapshot. This way we can not only decide what patches to put >> in 2.7.1, but it won't slow down development on trunk. If you prefer it >> another way, please shout. >> >> Cheers, >> Hadrian >> >> >> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote: >> >>> If cxf:endpoint is tested as is against 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT, i.e the spring >>> code, we should be home-free. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >>> >>>> We need to make sure camel-cxf works with both 2.3.x and 2.4.x, correct? >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2.4.3 will need some api changes on in/out interceptors. >>>>> Otherwise an upgrade is pretty easy. >>>>> >>>>> Also 2.4 is going to contain plenty more BP stuff. >>>>> That features file just started working 3 days ago. >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Christian, can we get some sort of commitment from the cxf community >>>>>> that cxf 2.4.x will be backwards compatible with 2.3.x? I saw that you >>>>>> made the following change on trunk: >>>>>> org.apache.cxf.*;version="[2.3.2,2.5)" >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there any other dependencies we need to upgrade? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes we need a new camel release to be compatible with cxf 2.4. The >>>>>>> question is only if we can also do something with the feature file to >>>>>>> make it compatible with cxf 2.3 and 2.4. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:24, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >>>>>>>> Hi Christian, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess that the camel-cxf POM should be also updated to update the >>>>>>>> CXF version range. >>>>>>>> So we need a new Camel release for that, no ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 04/04/2011 04:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>>>>>> What do we do with the karaf feature file? >>>>>>>>> The camel-cxf features are not suitable for cxf 2.4. On the other hand >>>>>>>>> CXF 2.4 brings it´s own feature file. So if the cxf feature is >>>>>>>>> installed >>>>>>>>> camel-cxf can just be installed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:20, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There are a few dependencies that are used with camel that we don't >>>>>>>>>> support as mentioned on the SMX mailing list and CAMEL-3830. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think we should support at least: >>>>>>>>>> * slf4j 1.6.x >>>>>>>>>> * jetty 7.3.1.v20110307 >>>>>>>>>> * cxf 2.4.x >>>>>>>>>> * (if you know of other dependencies that should be upgraded, please >>>>>>>>>> comment) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... and issue a camel-2.7.1 asap. Thoughts? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Willem > ---------------------------------- > FuseSource > Web: http://www.fusesource.com > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) > http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese) > Twitter: willemjiang > > Connect at CamelOne May 24-26 > The Open Source Integration Conference > http://camelone.com
