Yes, a bunch of tests fail trying to figure out what 'localhost' means :).
Caused by: java.net.UnknownHostException: unknown host
at org.xbill.DNS.Address.lookupHostName(Address.java:239)
at org.xbill.DNS.Address.getByName(Address.java:264)
at
org.apache.camel.component.dns.DnsIpEndpoint$1.process(DnsIpEndpoint.java:47)
Hadrian
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:37 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> Testing wise?
> I think I disabled all tests that would require a recursive resolver.
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 9:33 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
>> It also looks like the camel-dns component has some issues with my machine :(
>>
>> Hadrian
>>
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, were is the difficulty in supporting both?
>>> Asking as a complete ignoramus that has swapped quite a few projects,
>>> if we follow CXF conventions and respect bus creation I do not see where
>>> it'll be that hard?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>
>>>> We don't need to support cxf 2.3.x and 2.4.x at the same time. The current
>>>> camel-2.7.0 release does not support cxf 2.4.x at all now, because of the
>>>> following line in <camel.osgi.import.defaults>:
>>>> org.apache.cxf.*;version="[2.3.2,2.4)"
>>>>
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 4, 2011, at 10:00 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It could be no easy to support CXF 2.3.x and CXF 2.4.x at same time by
>>>>> reference the CXF feature in apache-camel feature. You have to deal with
>>>>> the repo reference url and CXF vesion in the apache-camel feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> In most case, the container which provides the runtime of camel and cxf
>>>>> does the align job itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Willem
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/4/11 10:40 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> OK,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry I have misunderstood you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, we can review the camel features descriptor to align camel and cxf
>>>>>> ones. It makes sense to reference the CXF features in camel-cxf one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/04/2011 04:32 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes we need a new camel release to be compatible with cxf 2.4. The
>>>>>>> question is only if we can also do something with the feature file to
>>>>>>> make it compatible with cxf 2.3 and 2.4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:24, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
>>>>>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess that the camel-cxf POM should be also updated to update the
>>>>>>>> CXF version range.
>>>>>>>> So we need a new Camel release for that, no ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2011 04:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>> What do we do with the karaf feature file?
>>>>>>>>> The camel-cxf features are not suitable for cxf 2.4. On the other hand
>>>>>>>>> CXF 2.4 brings it´s own feature file. So if the cxf feature is
>>>>>>>>> installed
>>>>>>>>> camel-cxf can just be installed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 04.04.2011 16:20, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are a few dependencies that are used with camel that we don't
>>>>>>>>>> support as mentioned on the SMX mailing list and CAMEL-3830.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think we should support at least:
>>>>>>>>>> * slf4j 1.6.x
>>>>>>>>>> * jetty 7.3.1.v20110307
>>>>>>>>>> * cxf 2.4.x
>>>>>>>>>> * (if you know of other dependencies that should be upgraded, please
>>>>>>>>>> comment)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ... and issue a camel-2.7.1 asap. Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Willem
>>>>> ----------------------------------
>>>>> FuseSource
>>>>> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
>>>>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
>>>>> http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
>>>>> Twitter: willemjiang
>>>>>
>>>>> Connect at CamelOne May 24-26
>>>>> The Open Source Integration Conference
>>>>> http://camelone.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
