L.S.,

That's awesome - thanks a lot!

Regards,

Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/


On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I can help to do the release of camel 2.8.3 :)
>
>
> On Fri Oct 28 16:23:01 2011, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> Over at the ServiceMix project, we are finalizing things for doing a
>> ServiceMix 4.4.0 release.  The original plan was to use CXF 2.4.2 and
>> Camel
>> 2.8.1 because of an issue with the CXF 2.4.3 release in combination with
>> Felix.  However, Dan has volunteered to do a quick CXF 2.4.4 release to
>> help
>> us out which the CXF problem.  Cfr.
>> http://servicemix.396122.n5.**nabble.com/Toward-ServiceMix-**
>> 4-4-td4909262.htmlfor<http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Toward-ServiceMix-4-4-td4909262.htmlfor>
>> some background...
>>
>> Unfortunately, because of a<repository>  reference in the Camel features
>> descriptor, that would mean we would also need a new Camel 2.8.x release
>> to
>> ensure everything works fine again.  I'm aware that the release
>> announcement
>> for 2.8.2 only went out earlier this week, so just checking if we would
>> consider doing a Camel 2.8.3 release right after the CXF 2.4.4 release is
>> out.  For the Apache ServiceMix project, this would definitely be highly
>> appreciated, as it would allow us to upgrade to the latest and greatest
>> Karaf, CXF and Camel for our upcoming release.
>>
>> FWIW, in the meanwhile we're also working at both the Karaf and the
>> ServiceMix end to make a things a more reliable and maintainable when
>> upgrading parts of the application, so this should allow us to prevent
>> these
>> kinds of issues in the future, but for now we're still trying to align the
>> entire universe here ;)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: 
>> http://gertvanthienen.**blogspot.com/<http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to