Hi On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > > I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call list or > start or stop. > > We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the commands > slightly different. > > Instead > camel:route-list > camel:context-list > > I propose to have: > camel-route:list > camel-context:list > > This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands. >
Interesting perspective. However I like that everything related to camel is camel:xxxx-yyyy Then you would know that camel: is the standard Camel shell plugin we provide. Isn't the Karaf using that notation as well, so its bundle:xxx-yyy, system:xxx-yyy etc > Christian > > > Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan: > >> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the >>> commands. >>> >>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html >>> >>> eg >>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list >> >> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we could do >> >> shell camel:route >> list >> start foo >> stop bar >> >> etc >> > > > -- > > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
