That's exactly what I had in mind. On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 18:29, Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: > Basically this is a good idea to wait. But then it may be best to not change > the commands at all for 2.9.0 so people have to adapt only once. > > What do you think? > > Christian > > > Am 08.12.2011 16:06, schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > >> +1 >> >> I don't see the need for a change now given that we'll have to change >> again with subshells. >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:54, j...@nanthrax.net<j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> I would wait the subshells and let the commands as it is. >>> >>> My 2 cents ;) >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://wwx.talend.com >>> >>> ----- Reply message ----- >>> From: "Christian Schneider"<ch...@die-schneider.net> >>> To:<dev@camel.apache.org> >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] - Align Camel karaf commands as Karaf is doing >>> Date: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 12:05 pm >>> >>> >>> The number of characters per command is the same. >>> Using tab can save you from typing most characters in both styles. >>> >>> So I think the focus on resources really makes the difference and I >>> think it is more natural to think in resources for humans than in >>> commands. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> Am 08.12.2011 10:38, schrieb Charles Moulliard: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I prefer that we keep as command family name a short name. "camel" is >>>> fine but "camel-route" or "camel-context" are too long. Imagine when >>>> operating a project on a platform, the number of characters to be >>>> typed on the keyboard. This has an impact which is not negligible. >>>> >>>> So why not using camel:lisr-routes, camel:list-contexts and their >>>> shortcut clr, clc >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Charles >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/12/11 09:49, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I really like the idea of having camel:route and then simply call >>>>> list or start or stop. >>>>> >>>>> We can even do that without the sub shells already by naming the >>>>> commands slightly different. >>>>> >>>>> Instead >>>>> camel:route-list >>>>> camel:context-list >>>>> >>>>> I propose to have: >>>>> camel-route:list >>>>> camel-context:list >>>>> >>>>> This would be more similar to the later sub shell commands. >>>>> >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 05.12.2011 09:54, schrieb James Strachan: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2 December 2011 15:29, Claus Ibsen<claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On the Karaf @dev they are talking about changing the naming of the >>>>>>> commands. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-New-Karaf-commands-norm-td3430815.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> eg >>>>>>> camel:list-routes --> camel:route-list >>>>>> >>>>>> Or we could even go with route:list so when there's sub shells we >>>>>> could do >>>>>> >>>>>> shell camel:route >>>>>> list >>>>>> start foo >>>>>> stop bar >>>>>> >>>>>> etc >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Schneider >>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>> >>> Open Source Architect >>> Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com >
-- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
