Hi Yeah Camel-Extras seems like a good place.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to extras. > > It is a murky area since it sure, is generated code... > > On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:08 AM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > >> Agreed (as I pointed out on the JIRA). >> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> I would personally just suggest Camel extras and be done with it. If >>> there is any question or concerns about the license issue, it's not worth >>> all the hastle and arguments and such. Stick it in extras. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Sam (Stephen Samuel) >>>> <samspad...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I don't think the word "hack" is quite right. The Akka Zeromq driver is >>>>> totally legit. I imagine they wrote it for the same reason - they wanted >>>>> to >>>>> keep Akka APL instead of GPL. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Its a hack in the sense that Akka went around the intent from ZeroMQ >>>> which is that their product is LGPL licensed. >>>> If they wanted people to integrate with ZeroMQ using other licenses >>>> then IMHO it would be better if ZeroMQ had dual licenses for its >>>> drivers. >>>> >>>> Since we cannot use a driver from the "source" eg ZeroMQ project, and >>>> have to defer to Akka project which is also Scala based (requiring >>>> Scala on the JVM) is imho going a bit far, and in the area of being a >>>> "hack". >>>> >>>> The other Camel components do not do this. So its a bit controversial >>>> if the ASF community of Camel is interested going down this road. >>>> >>>> And also the Akka releases is not published to maven central. Its not >>>> a blocker though. But software released to maven central is preferred. >>>> Its a bit of pain to have to rely on to many 3rd party maven repos. >>>> >>>>> On 25 September 2012 15:08, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> See ticket >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5557 >>>>>> >>>>>> As this component uses a bit of a "hack" to avoid using LGPL I would >>>>>> like fellow riders thoughts on this contribution? >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a number of comments on this ticket, I suggest to read to get >>>>>> up to speed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>>> ----------------- >>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. >>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>>>>> Email: cib...@redhat.com >>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>>>>> Twitter: davsclaus >>>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com >>>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Sam >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Claus Ibsen >>>> ----------------- >>>> Red Hat, Inc. >>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>>> Email: cib...@redhat.com >>>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>>> Twitter: davsclaus >>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com >>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Kulp >>> dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog >>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com >>> > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
