No, not really. We fixed some issues we didn't care much about in the past. And this is good! A better camel extra than in the past!
Best, Christian On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think this is what most of the people will expect as package name. > > I agree that "apacheextra" (single e) is better since it corresponds > to the groupId. Although "apachextras" (double e) is a valid domain > name, it confuses people :) . > > +1 for renaming Java package to "double e" notation i.e. apacheextra. > > PS 2.10.0 release of Camel Extra will be remembered as the most > painful in the history of the project :P . > > -- > Henryk Konsek > http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com > --
