On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 (strong) > > The package name should be > org.apacheextras (2 'e's, 1 's'). If you check the whois database [1], > apacheextras.org is owned by the ASF, whereas the other proposed domain is > not registered. The claim that somebody 'expects' a particular package name > is unfounded, I am curious how you would back up such a claim. >
That is also how I understood what Henryk proposed. To rename from single e to double e. At least that is what my +1 vote is casted upon. > Cheers, > Hadrian > > [1] http://whois.domaintools.com/apacheextras.org > > > > On 10/18/2012 11:56 AM, Henryk Konsek wrote: >>> >>> And this is good! A better camel extra than in the past! >> >> >> If nobody issues veto against changing Camel Extra java package name >> from "org.apachextra" (single e) to "org.apacheextra" (double e), I'd >> like to perform this refactoring tomorrow and stage another 2.10.0 >> release. >> >> Is that ok, I should I raise another mailing thread with regular poll >> for this issue? >> > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Email: cib...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
