I just send a PR by applying the patch of creating OSGi bundle for jSMPP.
Now Camel can consume the new jSMPP bundle from the Official release :)

--  
Willem Jiang

Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang  
Weibo: 姜宁willem



On January 7, 2015 at 5:03:16 AM, Christian Müller 
(christian.muel...@gmail.com) wrote:
> It would be good, if you could release JSMPP as an OSGI bundle. It's only a
> few more lines in the pom.xml file...
>  
> I'm wondering whether you should use a different Maven group id to
> differentiate for the original JSMPP library.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Christian
> -----------------
>  
> Software Integration Specialist
>  
> Apache Member
> V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
> Apache Incubator PMC Member
>  
> https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
>  
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>  
> >
> > I've been creating a 2.2.0 release of jSMPP with various bug fixes that
> > had been left in github pull requests
> >
> > What is the procedure to use this in Camel?
> >
> > I notice the camel-smpp/pom.xml uses an OSGi-bundle build of jSMPP:
> >
> >  
> > org.apache.servicemix.bundles
> > org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jsmpp
> > ${jsmpp-version}
> >  
> >
> > and it appears to have been created about 4 years ago by Jean-Baptiste:
> >
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/servicemix/smx4/bundles/tags/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jsmpp-2.1.0_2/
> >   
> >
> >
> > and published under a different group ID:
> >
> >
> > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jsmpp/2.1.0_2
> >   
> >
> > Should the bundle stuff be merged into the proper jSMPP JAR or is it
> > necessary to continue building a separate JAR like that for OSGi?
> >
> >
> >
>  

Reply via email to