I’m actually ok with the version range update. That said, we should probably then also go through the code and remove the reflection code and extra methods that are in there to support the two versions. Would clean it up a bit.
Dan > On Jul 13, 2015, at 6:19 AM, Aki Yoshida <elak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Claus, > could you look at my comment on this ticket regarding the cxf's > osgi-version range? > I think we should keep the range as before, that is to have [2.7,4.0). > So I am interested in hearing the argument for updating the range. > thanks. > regards, aki > > 2015-07-09 15:35 GMT+02:00 Aki Yoshida <elak...@gmail.com>: >> I can look into it tomorrow unless someone is already working on it or >> planning to do so. >> let me know. >> regards, aki >> >> 2015-07-09 8:03 GMT+02:00 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>: >>> Hi >>> >>> Wonder if any of the CXF guys can upgrade Camel master branch to the >>> new 3.1.x versions of Apache CXF. >>> >>> There may be more than just to do a version change in a pom.xml >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8893 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Claus Ibsen >>> ----------------- >>> Red Hat, Inc. >>> Email: cib...@redhat.com >>> Twitter: davsclaus >>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com >>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >>> hawtio: http://hawt.io/ >>> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/ -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
