On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > I’m actually ok with the version range update. That said, we should > probably then also go through the code and remove the reflection code and > extra methods that are in there to support the two versions. Would clean it > up a bit. > > Dan >
Good idea. I logged a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8959 > >> On Jul 13, 2015, at 6:19 AM, Aki Yoshida <elak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Claus, >> could you look at my comment on this ticket regarding the cxf's >> osgi-version range? >> I think we should keep the range as before, that is to have [2.7,4.0). >> So I am interested in hearing the argument for updating the range. >> thanks. >> regards, aki >> >> 2015-07-09 15:35 GMT+02:00 Aki Yoshida <elak...@gmail.com>: >>> I can look into it tomorrow unless someone is already working on it or >>> planning to do so. >>> let me know. >>> regards, aki >>> >>> 2015-07-09 8:03 GMT+02:00 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Wonder if any of the CXF guys can upgrade Camel master branch to the >>>> new 3.1.x versions of Apache CXF. >>>> >>>> There may be more than just to do a version change in a pom.xml >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8893 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Claus Ibsen >>>> ----------------- >>>> Red Hat, Inc. >>>> Email: cib...@redhat.com >>>> Twitter: davsclaus >>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com >>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen >>>> hawtio: http://hawt.io/ >>>> fabric8: http://fabric8.io/ > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen hawtio: http://hawt.io/ fabric8: http://fabric8.io/
