Hi Claus, I started working on that this morning.
I think I'll provide the new BOM and related updates early next week.





On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nicola
>
> How does your calendar look like? I wonder if you have time to work
> more on this Camel and Spring Boot stuff?
>
> I am afraid this one is the major task we have left before we can get
> started on the Camel 2.18 release and IMHO first class Spring Boot
> support is a major win/goal for Camel.
>
> So the work is very important, and its been awesome what you have
> done. Really love that we have integration tests, and also separated
> the auto stuff code from the existing components so there is clean
> separation.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Well, it was one of the drawbacks of the approach. Forcing users to
> include
> > *only* the camel BOM allows us to completely control the dependencies,
> but
> > it's probably a too strict requirement for users.
> >
> > We can also provide a option 1+2: i.e. a auto-generated Camel BOM without
> > any conflict with the spring-boot one (conflicts verified by eg. a maven
> > plugin).
> > Users will be able to import it in any order but, of course, some
> > components will not work because we cannot override what's in the
> > spring-boot BOM (unless the users force a different version in their pom,
> > but it's up to them).
> >
> > It makes more sense..
> > What do you think about it?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Nicola
> >>
> >> Great work on all this Spring Boot starter stuff.
> >>
> >> I would like to discuss/hear more about the #1 option you listed on
> >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1164
> >>
> >> I think that end users would really prefer their Spring Boot
> >> applications to be "pure" spring boot by having the Spring Boot BOM
> >> first and then possible the Camel BOM imported as 2nd.
> >>
> >> I am okay if there is some Camel components that would not work with
> >> Spring Boot such as Cassandra or others. For ActiveMQ then Camel only
> >> uses that for testing camel-jms component and do not have a strong
> >> dependency on the version. So end users should likely use the Spring
> >> Boot ActiveMQ starter.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I've worked on the spring-boot starters and BOM topic and opened a PR
> >> > recently. You can find a summary here [
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10222] and this is latest
> >> PR:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1164.
> >> >
> >> > Basically, the aim is allowing users to add camel components to their
> >> > application by just adding the corresponding "xx-starter" project to
> >> their
> >> > POM. This can be useful also for initializer tools like
> >> > https://start.spring.io/ and the likes, to create skeleton of
> >> applications
> >> > that just work, without having to worry about wrong transitive
> >> dependencies.
> >> > Starter projects take care of, eg. excluding unwanted logging
> libraries
> >> and
> >> > including eg. libraries that are provided in other contexts.
> >> >
> >> > The new BOM part is a semi-automated way to generate a BOM for the
> users
> >> > that fixes incompatibilities between the camel-parent BOM and the
> >> > spring-boot-dependencies BOM. They currently differ for the minor (and
> >> > sometimes major) version of many libraries, including eg. Jetty,
> >> ActiveMQ,
> >> > Hibernate Validator, Cassandra driver, etc. Both BOMs also include
> >> specific
> >> > versions of common libraries like guava, guice and gson that take
> >> > precedence over the transitive versions required by the starters,
> >> resulting
> >> > in camel components not working correctly.
> >> > The new BOM (partly generated) should be used in place of the two
> >> > Camel+Spring-boot BOMs to avoid such issues.
> >> >
> >> > I understand that this is a major change, so I ask your feedback about
> >> the
> >> > problem (do we want to have this feature to solve these problems for
> >> > users?) and the solution.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
> >> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thanks for taking a look at the PR Thomas - I really appreciate the
> >> >> feedback.
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) The parent pom was wrong because I created this PR before the
> change
> >> >> from 2.18-SNAPSHOT to 2.18.0-SNAPSHOT took place - it’s been out
> there a
> >> >> while
> >> >> 2) My bad on the READMEmd - you can probably tell where I copied the
> >> >> example from to get started :-).  I’ll get working on that to clean
> it
> >> up
> >> >> 3)  I really struggled with this - what example to use.  I thought a
> >> >> little about replacing JMS with something else, but I wasn’t quite
> sure
> >> >> what to use.  It gets a little more complicated because of the two
> JVMs
> >> >> (one for Karaf and one for the bootstrap code).  Anyway, if you have
> a
> >> >> “good” test route and what you’d like to see happen for testing, I’d
> >> really
> >> >> like to see it and I’ll try and use that instead.
> >> >> 4)  I’m not sure where I came up with the name of the example - but
> >> you’re
> >> >> right - I’ll change it to example-camel-test-karaf
> >> >> 5) I’ll get back in and figure out why the integration test is
> failing
> >> now
> >> >> - I was certain they were working at one time.  Anyway, the unit
> tests
> >> pass
> >> >> - but they generate a bunch of scary messages in the log files.  I
> >> didn’t
> >> >> see this stuff when I was using the class I derived
> >> CamelKarafTestSupport
> >> >> from.  If you have any ideas on how to clean those up, I’d really
> like
> >> to
> >> >> hear them.
> >> >>
> >> >> I’ve got one other bug to fix, then I’ll get back on this one.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you wouldn’t mind “watching” the JIRA for this (
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6132 <
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6132>), we can
> communicate
> >> >> there (rather than spam the DEV list).
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks Again
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Walzer, Thomas <
> >> >> thomas.wal...@integratix.net> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi, Quinn,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I took a look at PR987:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 1) the parent pom should be something like 2.18.0 not 2.18 (maybe
> the
> >> PR
> >> >> was around too long, so the parent changed).
> >> >> > 2) The readme really needs some love. It mentions spring when
> there is
> >> >> really blueprint; jms, when there is none, etc.
> >> >> > 3) for me an example replacing/redefining jms: or activemq: by
> seda:
> >> >> would really make a difference. Like having a jms-definitions-bp.xml
> and
> >> >> then replacing it by seda-definitions-bp.xml, or something like
> that. I
> >> >> know that´s not the point of your sample but the timer-example seems
> a
> >> bit
> >> >> basic.
> >> >> > 4) maybe …-test-karaf would be a better name?
> >> >> > 5) my unit tests and itests do not run through. If they would I
> could
> >> >> provide more fleshy feedback.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If I can help, let me know.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cheers, Thomas.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > T E S T S
> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> eFromFileTest
> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64]
> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR.
> >> java:304)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl
> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:241)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
> runReflectiveCall(
> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
> invokeExplosively(
> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
> >> ParentRunner.java:325)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
> ParentRunner.java:290)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
> >> ParentRunner.java:71)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
> >> ParentRunner.java:58)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121)
> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream
> >> already
> >> >> set
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.
> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start(
> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.activator.Activator.start(
> >> >> Activator.java:76)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153)
> >> >> >       ... 37 more
> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 10.485
> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> eFromFileTest
> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> eFromTestTest
> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64]
> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR.
> >> java:304)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl
> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:241)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
> runReflectiveCall(
> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
> invokeExplosively(
> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
> >> ParentRunner.java:325)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
> ParentRunner.java:290)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
> >> ParentRunner.java:71)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
> >> ParentRunner.java:58)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121)
> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream
> >> already
> >> >> set
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.
> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start(
> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.activator.Activator.start(
> >> >> Activator.java:76)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153)
> >> >> >       ... 37 more
> >> >> > *ERROR* Cannot use configuration HelloBean for [
> org.osgi.service.cm.
> >> ManagedService,
> >> >> id=63, bundle=1/jar:file:/Users/thomas/camel/examples/camel-
> >> >> example-blueprint/target/test-bundles/blueprintbeanpropertiesoverrid
> >> >> efromtesttest-1473353703335.jar!/]: No visibility to configuration
> >> bound
> >> >> to file:/Users/thomas/camel/examples/camel-example-
> >> >> blueprint/target/classes/
> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 38.07
> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> eFromTestTest
> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanTest
> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64]
> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR.
> >> java:304)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl
> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:237)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> Method)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
> runReflectiveCall(
> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
> invokeExplosively(
> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
> >> ParentRunner.java:325)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
> ParentRunner.java:290)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
> >> ParentRunner.java:71)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
> >> ParentRunner.java:58)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121)
> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream
> >> already
> >> >> set
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.
> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start(
> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.activator.Activator.start(
> >> >> Activator.java:76)
> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153)
> >> >> >       ... 37 more
> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 7.425
> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanTest
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Results :
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [INFO]
> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.2.0:manifest (bundle-manifest) @
> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
> >> >> > [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.camel:camel-
> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> >> : Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.apache.camel.*,
> >> >> org.springframework.ws.*, org.springframework.xml.*,
> >> org.springframework.*,
> >> >> org.apache.commons.logging.*, org.apache.cxf.*, org.apache.qpid.*,
> >> >> org.apache.abdera.*, org.apache.commons.httpclient.*,
> >> >> org.apache.velocity.*, org.apache.xmlbeans.*, org.eclipse.jetty.*,
> >> >> com.thoughtworks.xstream.*, org.antlr.stringtemplate.*,
> >> >> org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.*, org.mortbay.cometd.*, org.slf4j.*,
> >> >> net.sf.flatpack.*, net.sf.saxon.*, freemarker.*, javax.persistence.*,
> >> >> org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.solr.*]
> >> >> > [INFO]
> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.2.0:bundle (default-bundle) @
> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel-
> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> >> : No translation found for macro: greeting
> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel-
> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> >> : No translation found for macro: body
> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel-
> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> >> : Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.springframework.ws.*,
> >> >> org.springframework.xml.*, org.springframework.*,
> >> >> org.apache.commons.logging.*, org.apache.cxf.*, org.apache.qpid.*,
> >> >> org.apache.abdera.*, org.apache.commons.httpclient.*,
> >> >> org.apache.velocity.*, org.apache.xmlbeans.*, org.eclipse.jetty.*,
> >> >> com.thoughtworks.xstream.*, org.antlr.stringtemplate.*,
> >> >> org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.*, org.mortbay.cometd.*, org.slf4j.*,
> >> >> net.sf.flatpack.*, net.sf.saxon.*, freemarker.*, javax.persistence.*,
> >> >> org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.solr.*]
> >> >> > [INFO]
> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.5.1:attach-descriptor
> >> >> (attach-descriptor) @ camel-example-blueprint ---
> >> >> > [INFO]
> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.19.1:integration-test
> (default) @
> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > T E S T S
> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT
> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.392
> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT
> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT)  Time
> >> >> elapsed: 0.01 sec  <<< ERROR!
> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect.
> >> >> InvocationTargetException
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT.configure(
> >> >> BlueprintBeanIT.java:60)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> >> eFromFileIT
> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.029
> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.
> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT
> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.
> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT)  Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
> >> <<<
> >> >> ERROR!
> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect.
> >> >> InvocationTargetException
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> >> >> eFromFileIT.configure(BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> >> eFromFileIT.java:76)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> >> eFromTestIT
> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 0.015
> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.
> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT
> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.
> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT)  Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
> >> <<<
> >> >> ERROR!
> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect.
> >> >> InvocationTargetException
> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> >> >> eFromTestIT.configure(BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
> >> eFromTestIT.java:90)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Results :
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Tests in error:
> >> >> >  BlueprintBeanIT.initializationError » TestContainer
> >> >> java.lang.reflect.Invocati...
> >> >> >  BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT.initializationError »
> >> >> TestContainer ...
> >> >> >  BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT.initializationError »
> >> >> TestContainer ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [INFO]
> >> >> > [INFO] --- ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files
> >> (default)
> >> >> @ camel-example-blueprint ---
> >> >> > [INFO] Checking legal files in: camel-example-blueprint-2.18.
> >> >> 0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> >> >> > [INFO]
> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.19.1:verify (default) @
> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
> >> >> > [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> >> >> ------------
> >> >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> >> > [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> >> >> ------------
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Am 02.09.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Quinn Stevenson <
> >> >> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com>:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I’ve had a pull-request out there for a while (
> >> >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/987 <https://github.com/apache/
> >> >> camel/pull/987>) - looking for some feedback on the example project
> that
> >> >> attempts to show how to use camel-test-karaf.  I could really use
> some
> >> >> input.  I think fleshing-out this example will help refine the
> >> >> camel-test-karaf component itself.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:17 AM, Luca Burgazzoli <
> lburgazz...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Hi Claus,
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Yep, I'm going to close CAMEL-10274.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> ---
> >> >> >>> Luca Burgazzoli
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Claus Ibsen <
> >> claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>> Hi Luca
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> I can see you found out about the problem and found a solution.
> So
> >> the
> >> >> >>>> examples should work again.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Luca Burgazzoli <
> >> >> lburgazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>> Hi Claus,
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> can you tell me something more about log4j2 vs jetty plugin ?
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> ---
> >> >> >>>>> Luca Burgazzoli
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Claus Ibsen <
> >> claus.ib...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>> Hi
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Hope everybody had good summer vacation. I had my vacation in
> >> parts
> >> >> >>>>>> and have next week as PTO.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> We should get started to close down on the upcoming Camel 2.18
> >> >> release.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> There is some outstanding work (in no particular order)
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 1)
> >> >> >>>>>> Finish the spring boot stuff with the starter components.
> >> >> >>>>>> Nicola comes back from PTO and will work on this.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 2)
> >> >> >>>>>> rest-dsl to support calling REST services. I am working on
> this
> >> and
> >> >> >>>>>> have some outstanding work still around binding and other
> >> >> >>>>>> improvements.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 3)
> >> >> >>>>>> Tidy up the log4j v2 upgrade. Some of the examples do not
> start
> >> with
> >> >> >>>>>> the jetty plugin.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 4)
> >> >> >>>>>> Migrate the last wiki pages to adoc files. There is not so
> many
> >> >> pages
> >> >> >>>>>> left and you can find a report when running camel-catalog
> build
> >> that
> >> >> >>>>>> output what is missing.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> This will help us with a base-line for maintaining the
> >> documentation
> >> >> >>>>>> going forward in the source code adoc files instead of wiki,
> and
> >> we
> >> >> >>>>>> can then generate a new website and documentation for the
> >> following
> >> >> >>>>>> release (2.19 or 3.0) etc. But this is a discussion we should
> >> IMHO
> >> >> >>>>>> take post 2.18.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 5)
> >> >> >>>>>> camel-test-karaf module. This module is in the works but could
> >> use
> >> >> >>>>>> some review and finishing so its easier to use for end users.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Notice the existing camel-test-blueprint is still favored for
> >> doing
> >> >> >>>>>> unit tests which you can run fast and easily debug. The new
> >> >> >>>>>> camel-test-karaf is for running integration tests in a running
> >> karaf
> >> >> >>>>>> instance.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 6)
> >> >> >>>>>> We should look at the JIRA tickets that are assigned to 2.18.0
> >> and
> >> >> try
> >> >> >>>>>> to fix / implement them, or move them to 2.18.1 or 2.19.0 for
> >> next
> >> >> >>>>>> releases.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> 7)
> >> >> >>>>>> Keep an eye on the CI server to make sure the tests are green.
> >> >> >>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Camel/
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> If all goes well then hopefully in 2-3 weeks we are ready to
> cut
> >> >> the 2.18.0 RC.
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >> >>>>>> Claus Ibsen
> >> >> >>>>>> -----------------
> >> >> >>>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> >> >> >>>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> --
> >> >> >>>> Claus Ibsen
> >> >> >>>> -----------------
> >> >> >>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> >> >> >>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Claus Ibsen
> >> -----------------
> >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>

Reply via email to