Hi Nicola

When I build the latest code then some -starter modules are generated
for modules that ought to be blacklisted

components-starter/camel-ejb-starter/
components-starter/camel-ibatis-starter/
components-starter/camel-jclouds-starter/
components-starter/camel-quartz-starter/

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Claus, I started working on that this morning.
> I think I'll provide the new BOM and related updates early next week.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicola
>>
>> How does your calendar look like? I wonder if you have time to work
>> more on this Camel and Spring Boot stuff?
>>
>> I am afraid this one is the major task we have left before we can get
>> started on the Camel 2.18 release and IMHO first class Spring Boot
>> support is a major win/goal for Camel.
>>
>> So the work is very important, and its been awesome what you have
>> done. Really love that we have integration tests, and also separated
>> the auto stuff code from the existing components so there is clean
>> separation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Well, it was one of the drawbacks of the approach. Forcing users to
>> include
>> > *only* the camel BOM allows us to completely control the dependencies,
>> but
>> > it's probably a too strict requirement for users.
>> >
>> > We can also provide a option 1+2: i.e. a auto-generated Camel BOM without
>> > any conflict with the spring-boot one (conflicts verified by eg. a maven
>> > plugin).
>> > Users will be able to import it in any order but, of course, some
>> > components will not work because we cannot override what's in the
>> > spring-boot BOM (unless the users force a different version in their pom,
>> > but it's up to them).
>> >
>> > It makes more sense..
>> > What do you think about it?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Nicola
>> >>
>> >> Great work on all this Spring Boot starter stuff.
>> >>
>> >> I would like to discuss/hear more about the #1 option you listed on
>> >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1164
>> >>
>> >> I think that end users would really prefer their Spring Boot
>> >> applications to be "pure" spring boot by having the Spring Boot BOM
>> >> first and then possible the Camel BOM imported as 2nd.
>> >>
>> >> I am okay if there is some Camel components that would not work with
>> >> Spring Boot such as Cassandra or others. For ActiveMQ then Camel only
>> >> uses that for testing camel-jms component and do not have a strong
>> >> dependency on the version. So end users should likely use the Spring
>> >> Boot ActiveMQ starter.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I've worked on the spring-boot starters and BOM topic and opened a PR
>> >> > recently. You can find a summary here [
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10222] and this is latest
>> >> PR:
>> >> > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1164.
>> >> >
>> >> > Basically, the aim is allowing users to add camel components to their
>> >> > application by just adding the corresponding "xx-starter" project to
>> >> their
>> >> > POM. This can be useful also for initializer tools like
>> >> > https://start.spring.io/ and the likes, to create skeleton of
>> >> applications
>> >> > that just work, without having to worry about wrong transitive
>> >> dependencies.
>> >> > Starter projects take care of, eg. excluding unwanted logging
>> libraries
>> >> and
>> >> > including eg. libraries that are provided in other contexts.
>> >> >
>> >> > The new BOM part is a semi-automated way to generate a BOM for the
>> users
>> >> > that fixes incompatibilities between the camel-parent BOM and the
>> >> > spring-boot-dependencies BOM. They currently differ for the minor (and
>> >> > sometimes major) version of many libraries, including eg. Jetty,
>> >> ActiveMQ,
>> >> > Hibernate Validator, Cassandra driver, etc. Both BOMs also include
>> >> specific
>> >> > versions of common libraries like guava, guice and gson that take
>> >> > precedence over the transitive versions required by the starters,
>> >> resulting
>> >> > in camel components not working correctly.
>> >> > The new BOM (partly generated) should be used in place of the two
>> >> > Camel+Spring-boot BOMs to avoid such issues.
>> >> >
>> >> > I understand that this is a major change, so I ask your feedback about
>> >> the
>> >> > problem (do we want to have this feature to solve these problems for
>> >> > users?) and the solution.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
>> >> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Thanks for taking a look at the PR Thomas - I really appreciate the
>> >> >> feedback.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) The parent pom was wrong because I created this PR before the
>> change
>> >> >> from 2.18-SNAPSHOT to 2.18.0-SNAPSHOT took place - it’s been out
>> there a
>> >> >> while
>> >> >> 2) My bad on the READMEmd - you can probably tell where I copied the
>> >> >> example from to get started :-).  I’ll get working on that to clean
>> it
>> >> up
>> >> >> 3)  I really struggled with this - what example to use.  I thought a
>> >> >> little about replacing JMS with something else, but I wasn’t quite
>> sure
>> >> >> what to use.  It gets a little more complicated because of the two
>> JVMs
>> >> >> (one for Karaf and one for the bootstrap code).  Anyway, if you have
>> a
>> >> >> “good” test route and what you’d like to see happen for testing, I’d
>> >> really
>> >> >> like to see it and I’ll try and use that instead.
>> >> >> 4)  I’m not sure where I came up with the name of the example - but
>> >> you’re
>> >> >> right - I’ll change it to example-camel-test-karaf
>> >> >> 5) I’ll get back in and figure out why the integration test is
>> failing
>> >> now
>> >> >> - I was certain they were working at one time.  Anyway, the unit
>> tests
>> >> pass
>> >> >> - but they generate a bunch of scary messages in the log files.  I
>> >> didn’t
>> >> >> see this stuff when I was using the class I derived
>> >> CamelKarafTestSupport
>> >> >> from.  If you have any ideas on how to clean those up, I’d really
>> like
>> >> to
>> >> >> hear them.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I’ve got one other bug to fix, then I’ll get back on this one.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you wouldn’t mind “watching” the JIRA for this (
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6132 <
>> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6132>), we can
>> communicate
>> >> >> there (rather than spam the DEV list).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks Again
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Walzer, Thomas <
>> >> >> thomas.wal...@integratix.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi, Quinn,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I took a look at PR987:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) the parent pom should be something like 2.18.0 not 2.18 (maybe
>> the
>> >> PR
>> >> >> was around too long, so the parent changed).
>> >> >> > 2) The readme really needs some love. It mentions spring when
>> there is
>> >> >> really blueprint; jms, when there is none, etc.
>> >> >> > 3) for me an example replacing/redefining jms: or activemq: by
>> seda:
>> >> >> would really make a difference. Like having a jms-definitions-bp.xml
>> and
>> >> >> then replacing it by seda-definitions-bp.xml, or something like
>> that. I
>> >> >> know that´s not the point of your sample but the timer-example seems
>> a
>> >> bit
>> >> >> basic.
>> >> >> > 4) maybe …-test-karaf would be a better name?
>> >> >> > 5) my unit tests and itests do not run through. If they would I
>> could
>> >> >> provide more fleshy feedback.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If I can help, let me know.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Cheers, Thomas.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > T E S T S
>> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> eFromFileTest
>> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64]
>> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
>> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR.
>> >> java:304)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl
>> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
>> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
>> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
>> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:241)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
>> runReflectiveCall(
>> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
>> invokeExplosively(
>> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
>> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
>> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:325)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
>> ParentRunner.java:290)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:71)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:58)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
>> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
>> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121)
>> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream
>> >> already
>> >> >> set
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.
>> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start(
>> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.activator.Activator.start(
>> >> >> Activator.java:76)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
>> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153)
>> >> >> >       ... 37 more
>> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 10.485
>> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> eFromFileTest
>> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> eFromTestTest
>> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64]
>> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
>> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR.
>> >> java:304)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl
>> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
>> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
>> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
>> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:241)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
>> runReflectiveCall(
>> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
>> invokeExplosively(
>> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
>> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
>> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:325)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
>> ParentRunner.java:290)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:71)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:58)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
>> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
>> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121)
>> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream
>> >> already
>> >> >> set
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.
>> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start(
>> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.activator.Activator.start(
>> >> >> Activator.java:76)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
>> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153)
>> >> >> >       ... 37 more
>> >> >> > *ERROR* Cannot use configuration HelloBean for [
>> org.osgi.service.cm.
>> >> ManagedService,
>> >> >> id=63, bundle=1/jar:file:/Users/thomas/camel/examples/camel-
>> >> >> example-blueprint/target/test-bundles/blueprintbeanpropertiesoverrid
>> >> >> efromtesttest-1473353703335.jar!/]: No visibility to configuration
>> >> bound
>> >> >> to file:/Users/thomas/camel/examples/camel-example-
>> >> >> blueprint/target/classes/
>> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 38.07
>> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> eFromTestTest
>> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanTest
>> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64]
>> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
>> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR.
>> >> java:304)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl
>> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
>> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
>> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.
>> CamelBlueprintTestSupport.
>> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:237)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
>> Method)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>> >> >> >       at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>> >> >> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.
>> runReflectiveCall(
>> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
>> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.
>> invokeExplosively(
>> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
>> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
>> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.
>> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:325)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
>> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(
>> ParentRunner.java:290)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:71)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(
>> >> ParentRunner.java:58)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
>> >> >> RunAfters.java:27)
>> >> >> >       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
>> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
>> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
>> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
>> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
>> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
>> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121)
>> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream
>> >> already
>> >> >> set
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.
>> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start(
>> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.activator.Activator.start(
>> >> >> Activator.java:76)
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start(
>> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153)
>> >> >> >       ... 37 more
>> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 7.425
>> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanTest
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Results :
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > [INFO]
>> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.2.0:manifest (bundle-manifest) @
>> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
>> >> >> > [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.camel:camel-
>> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >> >> : Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.apache.camel.*,
>> >> >> org.springframework.ws.*, org.springframework.xml.*,
>> >> org.springframework.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.commons.logging.*, org.apache.cxf.*, org.apache.qpid.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.abdera.*, org.apache.commons.httpclient.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.velocity.*, org.apache.xmlbeans.*, org.eclipse.jetty.*,
>> >> >> com.thoughtworks.xstream.*, org.antlr.stringtemplate.*,
>> >> >> org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.*, org.mortbay.cometd.*, org.slf4j.*,
>> >> >> net.sf.flatpack.*, net.sf.saxon.*, freemarker.*, javax.persistence.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.solr.*]
>> >> >> > [INFO]
>> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.2.0:bundle (default-bundle) @
>> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
>> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel-
>> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >> >> : No translation found for macro: greeting
>> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel-
>> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >> >> : No translation found for macro: body
>> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel-
>> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT
>> >> >> : Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.springframework.ws.*,
>> >> >> org.springframework.xml.*, org.springframework.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.commons.logging.*, org.apache.cxf.*, org.apache.qpid.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.abdera.*, org.apache.commons.httpclient.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.velocity.*, org.apache.xmlbeans.*, org.eclipse.jetty.*,
>> >> >> com.thoughtworks.xstream.*, org.antlr.stringtemplate.*,
>> >> >> org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.*, org.mortbay.cometd.*, org.slf4j.*,
>> >> >> net.sf.flatpack.*, net.sf.saxon.*, freemarker.*, javax.persistence.*,
>> >> >> org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.solr.*]
>> >> >> > [INFO]
>> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.5.1:attach-descriptor
>> >> >> (attach-descriptor) @ camel-example-blueprint ---
>> >> >> > [INFO]
>> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.19.1:integration-test
>> (default) @
>> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > T E S T S
>> >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT
>> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 0.392
>> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT
>> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT)  Time
>> >> >> elapsed: 0.01 sec  <<< ERROR!
>> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect.
>> >> >> InvocationTargetException
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT.configure(
>> >> >> BlueprintBeanIT.java:60)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> >> eFromFileIT
>> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 0.029
>> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.
>> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT
>> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.
>> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT)  Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
>> >> <<<
>> >> >> ERROR!
>> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect.
>> >> >> InvocationTargetException
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> >> >> eFromFileIT.configure(BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> >> eFromFileIT.java:76)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> >> eFromTestIT
>> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 0.015
>> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.
>> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT
>> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.
>> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT)  Time elapsed: 0.001 sec
>> >> <<<
>> >> >> ERROR!
>> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect.
>> >> >> InvocationTargetException
>> >> >> >       at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> >> >> eFromTestIT.configure(BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid
>> >> eFromTestIT.java:90)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Results :
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Tests in error:
>> >> >> >  BlueprintBeanIT.initializationError » TestContainer
>> >> >> java.lang.reflect.Invocati...
>> >> >> >  BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT.initializationError »
>> >> >> TestContainer ...
>> >> >> >  BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT.initializationError »
>> >> >> TestContainer ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > [INFO]
>> >> >> > [INFO] --- ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files
>> >> (default)
>> >> >> @ camel-example-blueprint ---
>> >> >> > [INFO] Checking legal files in: camel-example-blueprint-2.18.
>> >> >> 0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> >> >> > [INFO]
>> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.19.1:verify (default) @
>> >> >> camel-example-blueprint ---
>> >> >> > [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> >> >> ------------
>> >> >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> >> >> > [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> >> >> ------------
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Am 02.09.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Quinn Stevenson <
>> >> >> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com>:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I’ve had a pull-request out there for a while (
>> >> >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/987 <https://github.com/apache/
>> >> >> camel/pull/987>) - looking for some feedback on the example project
>> that
>> >> >> attempts to show how to use camel-test-karaf.  I could really use
>> some
>> >> >> input.  I think fleshing-out this example will help refine the
>> >> >> camel-test-karaf component itself.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:17 AM, Luca Burgazzoli <
>> lburgazz...@gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Hi Claus,
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Yep, I'm going to close CAMEL-10274.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> ---
>> >> >> >>> Luca Burgazzoli
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Claus Ibsen <
>> >> claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> Hi Luca
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> I can see you found out about the problem and found a solution.
>> So
>> >> the
>> >> >> >>>> examples should work again.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Luca Burgazzoli <
>> >> >> lburgazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>> Hi Claus,
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> can you tell me something more about log4j2 vs jetty plugin ?
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> ---
>> >> >> >>>>> Luca Burgazzoli
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Claus Ibsen <
>> >> claus.ib...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>> Hi
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Hope everybody had good summer vacation. I had my vacation in
>> >> parts
>> >> >> >>>>>> and have next week as PTO.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> We should get started to close down on the upcoming Camel 2.18
>> >> >> release.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> There is some outstanding work (in no particular order)
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 1)
>> >> >> >>>>>> Finish the spring boot stuff with the starter components.
>> >> >> >>>>>> Nicola comes back from PTO and will work on this.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 2)
>> >> >> >>>>>> rest-dsl to support calling REST services. I am working on
>> this
>> >> and
>> >> >> >>>>>> have some outstanding work still around binding and other
>> >> >> >>>>>> improvements.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 3)
>> >> >> >>>>>> Tidy up the log4j v2 upgrade. Some of the examples do not
>> start
>> >> with
>> >> >> >>>>>> the jetty plugin.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 4)
>> >> >> >>>>>> Migrate the last wiki pages to adoc files. There is not so
>> many
>> >> >> pages
>> >> >> >>>>>> left and you can find a report when running camel-catalog
>> build
>> >> that
>> >> >> >>>>>> output what is missing.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> This will help us with a base-line for maintaining the
>> >> documentation
>> >> >> >>>>>> going forward in the source code adoc files instead of wiki,
>> and
>> >> we
>> >> >> >>>>>> can then generate a new website and documentation for the
>> >> following
>> >> >> >>>>>> release (2.19 or 3.0) etc. But this is a discussion we should
>> >> IMHO
>> >> >> >>>>>> take post 2.18.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 5)
>> >> >> >>>>>> camel-test-karaf module. This module is in the works but could
>> >> use
>> >> >> >>>>>> some review and finishing so its easier to use for end users.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Notice the existing camel-test-blueprint is still favored for
>> >> doing
>> >> >> >>>>>> unit tests which you can run fast and easily debug. The new
>> >> >> >>>>>> camel-test-karaf is for running integration tests in a running
>> >> karaf
>> >> >> >>>>>> instance.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 6)
>> >> >> >>>>>> We should look at the JIRA tickets that are assigned to 2.18.0
>> >> and
>> >> >> try
>> >> >> >>>>>> to fix / implement them, or move them to 2.18.1 or 2.19.0 for
>> >> next
>> >> >> >>>>>> releases.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> 7)
>> >> >> >>>>>> Keep an eye on the CI server to make sure the tests are green.
>> >> >> >>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Camel/
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> If all goes well then hopefully in 2-3 weeks we are ready to
>> cut
>> >> >> the 2.18.0 RC.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>> Claus Ibsen
>> >> >> >>>>>> -----------------
>> >> >> >>>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> >> >> >>>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> --
>> >> >> >>>> Claus Ibsen
>> >> >> >>>> -----------------
>> >> >> >>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> >> >> >>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Claus Ibsen
>> >> -----------------
>> >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2

Reply via email to