Hi Gregor When Andreas have updated the SMX bundles tomorrow, then we should be ready to start cutting a RC.
I wonder when you have time in your calendar to cut a release? On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello Claus, > > We are on vote now. Hopefully we should be able to have the bundles on Friday. > -- > Andrea Cosentino > ---------------------------------- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix Committer > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter: @oscerd2 > Github: oscerd > > > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:17 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Hi Andrea > > How is it going with the SMX bundle release? > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Andrea Cosentino > <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: >> During the weekend JB will cut release for SMX bundles. >> >> So we should be able to align karaf features and be ready to release by the >> middle of the next week. >> -- >> Andrea Cosentino >> ---------------------------------- >> Apache Camel PMC Member >> Apache Karaf Committer >> Apache Servicemix Committer >> Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com >> Twitter: @oscerd2 >> Github: oscerd >> >> >> >> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:36 AM, Andrea Cosentino >> <ancosen1...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >> I physically removed the folders of the starters and I pulled master >> aligning to the codebase. >> >> This way it should work fine. >> >> -- >> Andrea Cosentino >> ---------------------------------- >> Apache Camel PMC Member >> Apache Karaf Committer >> Apache Servicemix Committer >> Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com >> Twitter: @oscerd2 >> Github: oscerd >> >> >> >> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 9:26 AM, Nicola Ferraro >> <ni.ferr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That Happened also to Andrea yesterday. The cause should be the blacklist, >> that is hardcoded in the camel-package maven plugin, so you have to rebuild >> the plugin first. >> The plugin does not delete the starters, it is just able to create them. >> They have been deleted from the repo, but probably some git clients leave >> the empty folders, so I pushed right now some changes to improve the >> detection of all required starters. >> >> But once they are created by chance, you have to delete them manually. >> Deleting them and doing a full rebuild should solve the problem, because >> the plugin is at the top of the reactor list. Just a full rebuild after the >> update should be sufficient for the others (I hope). >> >> I just did a check with latest code from Apache master. >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Nicola >>> >>> When I build the latest code then some -starter modules are generated >>> for modules that ought to be blacklisted >>> >>> components-starter/camel-ejb-starter/ >>> components-starter/camel-ibatis-starter/ >>> components-starter/camel-jclouds-starter/ >>> components-starter/camel-quartz-starter/ >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Claus, I started working on that this morning. >>> > I think I'll provide the new BOM and related updates early next week. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi Nicola >>> >> >>> >> How does your calendar look like? I wonder if you have time to work >>> >> more on this Camel and Spring Boot stuff? >>> >> >>> >> I am afraid this one is the major task we have left before we can get >>> >> started on the Camel 2.18 release and IMHO first class Spring Boot >>> >> support is a major win/goal for Camel. >>> >> >>> >> So the work is very important, and its been awesome what you have >>> >> done. Really love that we have integration tests, and also separated >>> >> the auto stuff code from the existing components so there is clean >>> >> separation. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Nicola Ferraro <ni.ferr...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > Well, it was one of the drawbacks of the approach. Forcing users to >>> >> include >>> >> > *only* the camel BOM allows us to completely control the dependencies, >>> >> but >>> >> > it's probably a too strict requirement for users. >>> >> > >>> >> > We can also provide a option 1+2: i.e. a auto-generated Camel BOM >>> without >>> >> > any conflict with the spring-boot one (conflicts verified by eg. a >>> maven >>> >> > plugin). >>> >> > Users will be able to import it in any order but, of course, some >>> >> > components will not work because we cannot override what's in the >>> >> > spring-boot BOM (unless the users force a different version in their >>> pom, >>> >> > but it's up to them). >>> >> > >>> >> > It makes more sense.. >>> >> > What do you think about it? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi Nicola >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Great work on all this Spring Boot starter stuff. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I would like to discuss/hear more about the #1 option you listed on >>> >> >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1164 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I think that end users would really prefer their Spring Boot >>> >> >> applications to be "pure" spring boot by having the Spring Boot BOM >>> >> >> first and then possible the Camel BOM imported as 2nd. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I am okay if there is some Camel components that would not work with >>> >> >> Spring Boot such as Cassandra or others. For ActiveMQ then Camel only >>> >> >> uses that for testing camel-jms component and do not have a strong >>> >> >> dependency on the version. So end users should likely use the Spring >>> >> >> Boot ActiveMQ starter. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Nicola Ferraro < >>> ni.ferr...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > I've worked on the spring-boot starters and BOM topic and opened a >>> PR >>> >> >> > recently. You can find a summary here [ >>> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10222] and this is >>> latest >>> >> >> PR: >>> >> >> > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1164. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Basically, the aim is allowing users to add camel components to >>> their >>> >> >> > application by just adding the corresponding "xx-starter" project >>> to >>> >> >> their >>> >> >> > POM. This can be useful also for initializer tools like >>> >> >> > https://start.spring.io/ and the likes, to create skeleton of >>> >> >> applications >>> >> >> > that just work, without having to worry about wrong transitive >>> >> >> dependencies. >>> >> >> > Starter projects take care of, eg. excluding unwanted logging >>> >> libraries >>> >> >> and >>> >> >> > including eg. libraries that are provided in other contexts. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > The new BOM part is a semi-automated way to generate a BOM for the >>> >> users >>> >> >> > that fixes incompatibilities between the camel-parent BOM and the >>> >> >> > spring-boot-dependencies BOM. They currently differ for the minor >>> (and >>> >> >> > sometimes major) version of many libraries, including eg. Jetty, >>> >> >> ActiveMQ, >>> >> >> > Hibernate Validator, Cassandra driver, etc. Both BOMs also include >>> >> >> specific >>> >> >> > versions of common libraries like guava, guice and gson that take >>> >> >> > precedence over the transitive versions required by the starters, >>> >> >> resulting >>> >> >> > in camel components not working correctly. >>> >> >> > The new BOM (partly generated) should be used in place of the two >>> >> >> > Camel+Spring-boot BOMs to avoid such issues. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > I understand that this is a major change, so I ask your feedback >>> about >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> > problem (do we want to have this feature to solve these problems >>> for >>> >> >> > users?) and the solution. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Thanks >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Quinn Stevenson < >>> >> >> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> Thanks for taking a look at the PR Thomas - I really appreciate >>> the >>> >> >> >> feedback. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 1) The parent pom was wrong because I created this PR before the >>> >> change >>> >> >> >> from 2.18-SNAPSHOT to 2.18.0-SNAPSHOT took place - it’s been out >>> >> there a >>> >> >> >> while >>> >> >> >> 2) My bad on the READMEmd - you can probably tell where I copied >>> the >>> >> >> >> example from to get started :-). I’ll get working on that to >>> clean >>> >> it >>> >> >> up >>> >> >> >> 3) I really struggled with this - what example to use. I >>> thought a >>> >> >> >> little about replacing JMS with something else, but I wasn’t quite >>> >> sure >>> >> >> >> what to use. It gets a little more complicated because of the two >>> >> JVMs >>> >> >> >> (one for Karaf and one for the bootstrap code). Anyway, if you >>> have >>> >> a >>> >> >> >> “good” test route and what you’d like to see happen for testing, >>> I’d >>> >> >> really >>> >> >> >> like to see it and I’ll try and use that instead. >>> >> >> >> 4) I’m not sure where I came up with the name of the example - >>> but >>> >> >> you’re >>> >> >> >> right - I’ll change it to example-camel-test-karaf >>> >> >> >> 5) I’ll get back in and figure out why the integration test is >>> >> failing >>> >> >> now >>> >> >> >> - I was certain they were working at one time. Anyway, the unit >>> >> tests >>> >> >> pass >>> >> >> >> - but they generate a bunch of scary messages in the log files. I >>> >> >> didn’t >>> >> >> >> see this stuff when I was using the class I derived >>> >> >> CamelKarafTestSupport >>> >> >> >> from. If you have any ideas on how to clean those up, I’d really >>> >> like >>> >> >> to >>> >> >> >> hear them. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> I’ve got one other bug to fix, then I’ll get back on this one. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> If you wouldn’t mind “watching” the JIRA for this ( >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6132 < >>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6132>), we can >>> >> communicate >>> >> >> >> there (rather than spam the DEV list). >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Thanks Again >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Walzer, Thomas < >>> >> >> >> thomas.wal...@integratix.net> wrote: >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Hi, Quinn, >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > I took a look at PR987: >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > 1) the parent pom should be something like 2.18.0 not 2.18 >>> (maybe >>> >> the >>> >> >> PR >>> >> >> >> was around too long, so the parent changed). >>> >> >> >> > 2) The readme really needs some love. It mentions spring when >>> >> there is >>> >> >> >> really blueprint; jms, when there is none, etc. >>> >> >> >> > 3) for me an example replacing/redefining jms: or activemq: by >>> >> seda: >>> >> >> >> would really make a difference. Like having a >>> jms-definitions-bp.xml >>> >> and >>> >> >> >> then replacing it by seda-definitions-bp.xml, or something like >>> >> that. I >>> >> >> >> know that´s not the point of your sample but the timer-example >>> seems >>> >> a >>> >> >> bit >>> >> >> >> basic. >>> >> >> >> > 4) maybe …-test-karaf would be a better name? >>> >> >> >> > 5) my unit tests and itests do not run through. If they would I >>> >> could >>> >> >> >> provide more fleshy feedback. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > If I can help, let me know. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Cheers, Thomas. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> > T E S T S >>> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> eFromFileTest >>> >> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64] >>> >> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start( >>> >> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR. >>> >> >> java:304) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl >>> >> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint. >>> >> CamelBlueprintTestSupport. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint. >>> >> CamelBlueprintTestSupport. >>> >> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:241) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native >>> >> Method) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>> >> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>> >> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>> >> >> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1. >>> >> runReflectiveCall( >>> >> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> model.ReflectiveCallable.run( >>> >> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod. >>> >> invokeExplosively( >>> >> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>> >> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> RunAfters.java:27) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1. >>> >> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1. >>> >> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:325) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>> >> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>> >> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( >>> >> ParentRunner.java:290) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:71) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( >>> >> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:58) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> RunAfters.java:27) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. >>> java:363) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. >>> junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( >>> >> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>> >> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>> >> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. >>> junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( >>> >> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. >>> >> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. >>> >> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( >>> >> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121) >>> >> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream >>> >> >> already >>> >> >> >> set >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime. >>> >> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start( >>> >> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime. >>> activator.Activator.start( >>> >> >> >> Activator.java:76) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start( >>> >> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153) >>> >> >> >> > ... 37 more >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >>> >> 10.485 >>> >> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> eFromFileTest >>> >> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> eFromTestTest >>> >> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64] >>> >> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start( >>> >> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR. >>> >> >> java:304) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl >>> >> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint. >>> >> CamelBlueprintTestSupport. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint. >>> >> CamelBlueprintTestSupport. >>> >> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:241) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native >>> >> Method) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>> >> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>> >> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>> >> >> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1. >>> >> runReflectiveCall( >>> >> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> model.ReflectiveCallable.run( >>> >> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod. >>> >> invokeExplosively( >>> >> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>> >> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> RunAfters.java:27) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1. >>> >> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1. >>> >> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:325) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>> >> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>> >> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( >>> >> ParentRunner.java:290) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:71) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( >>> >> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:58) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> RunAfters.java:27) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. >>> java:363) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. >>> junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( >>> >> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>> >> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>> >> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. >>> junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( >>> >> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. >>> >> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. >>> >> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( >>> >> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121) >>> >> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream >>> >> >> already >>> >> >> >> set >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime. >>> >> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start( >>> >> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime. >>> activator.Activator.start( >>> >> >> >> Activator.java:76) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start( >>> >> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153) >>> >> >> >> > ... 37 more >>> >> >> >> > *ERROR* Cannot use configuration HelloBean for [ >>> >> org.osgi.service.cm. >>> >> >> ManagedService, >>> >> >> >> id=63, bundle=1/jar:file:/Users/thomas/camel/examples/camel- >>> >> >> >> example-blueprint/target/test-bundles/ >>> blueprintbeanpropertiesoverrid >>> >> >> >> efromtesttest-1473353703335.jar!/]: No visibility to >>> configuration >>> >> >> bound >>> >> >> >> to file:/Users/thomas/camel/examples/camel-example- >>> >> >> >> blueprint/target/classes/ >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >>> >> 38.07 >>> >> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> eFromTestTest >>> >> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanTest >>> >> >> >> > Unable to start bundle: org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime [64] >>> >> >> >> > org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unable to start bundle >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start( >>> >> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:163) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSR.startBundles(PojoSR. >>> >> >> java:304) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:248) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoSR.<init>(PojoSR.java:129) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect. >>> PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl >>> >> >> >> .newPojoServiceRegistry(PojoServiceRegistryFactoryImpl.java:52) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:173) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint.CamelBlueprintHelper. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintHelper.java:119) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint. >>> >> CamelBlueprintTestSupport. >>> >> >> >> createBundleContext(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:127) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.test.blueprint. >>> >> CamelBlueprintTestSupport. >>> >> >> >> setUp(CamelBlueprintTestSupport.java:237) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native >>> >> Method) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>> >> >> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>> >> >> >> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>> >> >> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>> >> >> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1. >>> >> runReflectiveCall( >>> >> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:50) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> model.ReflectiveCallable.run( >>> >> >> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:12) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod. >>> >> invokeExplosively( >>> >> >> >> FrameworkMethod.java:47) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>> >> >> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:24) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> RunAfters.java:27) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1. >>> >> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1. >>> >> evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:325) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>> >> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>> >> >> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run( >>> >> ParentRunner.java:290) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:71) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren( >>> >> >> >> ParentRunner.java:288) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000( >>> >> >> ParentRunner.java:58) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> ParentRunner.java:268) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.internal.runners. >>> statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>> >> >> >> RunAfters.java:27) >>> >> >> >> > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner. >>> java:363) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. >>> junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( >>> >> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:367) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>> >> >> >> executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:274) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>> >> >> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire. >>> junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( >>> >> >> >> JUnit4Provider.java:161) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. >>> >> >> >> invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:290) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter. >>> >> >> >> runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:242) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( >>> >> >> >> ForkedBooter.java:121) >>> >> >> >> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Thread Print Stream >>> >> >> already >>> >> >> >> set >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime. >>> >> threadio.ThreadIOImpl.start( >>> >> >> >> ThreadIOImpl.java:49) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime. >>> activator.Activator.start( >>> >> >> >> Activator.java:76) >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.felix.connect.PojoSRBundle.start( >>> >> >> >> PojoSRBundle.java:153) >>> >> >> >> > ... 37 more >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >>> >> 7.425 >>> >> >> >> sec - in org.apache.camel.BlueprintBeanTest >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Results : >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.2.0:manifest >>> (bundle-manifest) @ >>> >> >> >> camel-example-blueprint --- >>> >> >> >> > [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.camel:camel- >>> >> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT >>> >> >> >> : Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.apache.camel.*, >>> >> >> >> org.springframework.ws.*, org.springframework.xml.*, >>> >> >> org.springframework.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.commons.logging.*, org.apache.cxf.*, org.apache.qpid.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.abdera.*, org.apache.commons.httpclient.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.velocity.*, org.apache.xmlbeans.*, org.eclipse.jetty.*, >>> >> >> >> com.thoughtworks.xstream.*, org.antlr.stringtemplate.*, >>> >> >> >> org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.*, org.mortbay.cometd.*, org.slf4j.*, >>> >> >> >> net.sf.flatpack.*, net.sf.saxon.*, freemarker.*, >>> javax.persistence.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.solr.*] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:3.2.0:bundle (default-bundle) @ >>> >> >> >> camel-example-blueprint --- >>> >> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel- >>> >> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT >>> >> >> >> : No translation found for macro: greeting >>> >> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel- >>> >> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT >>> >> >> >> : No translation found for macro: body >>> >> >> >> > [WARNING] Bundle org.apache.camel:camel- >>> >> >> example-blueprint:bundle:2.18.0-SNAPSHOT >>> >> >> >> : Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.springframework.ws.*, >>> >> >> >> org.springframework.xml.*, org.springframework.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.commons.logging.*, org.apache.cxf.*, org.apache.qpid.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.abdera.*, org.apache.commons.httpclient.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.velocity.*, org.apache.xmlbeans.*, org.eclipse.jetty.*, >>> >> >> >> com.thoughtworks.xstream.*, org.antlr.stringtemplate.*, >>> >> >> >> org.ccil.cowan.tagsoup.*, org.mortbay.cometd.*, org.slf4j.*, >>> >> >> >> net.sf.flatpack.*, net.sf.saxon.*, freemarker.*, >>> javax.persistence.*, >>> >> >> >> org.apache.lucene.*, org.apache.solr.*] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.5.1:attach-descriptor >>> >> >> >> (attach-descriptor) @ camel-example-blueprint --- >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.19.1:integration-test >>> >> (default) @ >>> >> >> >> camel-example-blueprint --- >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> > T E S T S >>> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >>> >> 0.392 >>> >> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT >>> >> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT) >>> Time >>> >> >> >> elapsed: 0.01 sec <<< ERROR! >>> >> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect. >>> >> >> >> InvocationTargetException >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanIT.configure( >>> >> >> >> BlueprintBeanIT.java:60) >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> >> eFromFileIT >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >>> >> 0.029 >>> >> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest. >>> >> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT >>> >> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest. >>> >> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT) Time elapsed: 0.001 >>> sec >>> >> >> <<< >>> >> >> >> ERROR! >>> >> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect. >>> >> >> >> InvocationTargetException >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> >> >> eFromFileIT.configure(BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> >> eFromFileIT.java:76) >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Running org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> >> eFromTestIT >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >>> >> 0.015 >>> >> >> >> sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.camel.itest. >>> >> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT >>> >> >> >> > initializationError(org.apache.camel.itest. >>> >> >> >> BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT) Time elapsed: 0.001 >>> sec >>> >> >> <<< >>> >> >> >> ERROR! >>> >> >> >> > org.ops4j.pax.exam.TestContainerException: java.lang.reflect. >>> >> >> >> InvocationTargetException >>> >> >> >> > at org.apache.camel.itest.BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> >> >> eFromTestIT.configure(BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrid >>> >> >> eFromTestIT.java:90) >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Results : >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Tests in error: >>> >> >> >> > BlueprintBeanIT.initializationError » TestContainer >>> >> >> >> java.lang.reflect.Invocati... >>> >> >> >> > BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromFileIT.initializationError >>> » >>> >> >> >> TestContainer ... >>> >> >> >> > BlueprintBeanPropertiesOverrideFromTestIT.initializationError >>> » >>> >> >> >> TestContainer ... >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Skipped: 0 >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] --- ianal-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-1:verify-legal-files >>> >> >> (default) >>> >> >> >> @ camel-example-blueprint --- >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] Checking legal files in: camel-example-blueprint-2.18. >>> >> >> >> 0-SNAPSHOT.jar >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] --- maven-failsafe-plugin:2.19.1:verify (default) @ >>> >> >> >> camel-example-blueprint --- >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] ------------------------------ >>> >> ------------------------------ >>> >> >> >> ------------ >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE >>> >> >> >> > [INFO] ------------------------------ >>> >> ------------------------------ >>> >> >> >> ------------ >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >> Am 02.09.2016 um 17:12 schrieb Quinn Stevenson < >>> >> >> >> qu...@pronoia-solutions.com>: >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> I’ve had a pull-request out there for a while ( >>> >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/987 < >>> https://github.com/apache/ >>> >> >> >> camel/pull/987>) - looking for some feedback on the example >>> project >>> >> that >>> >> >> >> attempts to show how to use camel-test-karaf. I could really use >>> >> some >>> >> >> >> input. I think fleshing-out this example will help refine the >>> >> >> >> camel-test-karaf component itself. >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Aug 30, 2016, at 4:17 AM, Luca Burgazzoli < >>> >> lburgazz...@gmail.com >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> Hi Claus, >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> Yep, I'm going to close CAMEL-10274. >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> --- >>> >> >> >> >>> Luca Burgazzoli >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Claus Ibsen < >>> >> >> claus.ib...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>>> Hi Luca >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> I can see you found out about the problem and found a >>> solution. >>> >> So >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> >> >>>> examples should work again. >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Luca Burgazzoli < >>> >> >> >> lburgazz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>>>> Hi Claus, >>> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>> can you tell me something more about log4j2 vs jetty plugin >>> ? >>> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>> --- >>> >> >> >> >>>>> Luca Burgazzoli >>> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Claus Ibsen < >>> >> >> claus.ib...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Hi >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Hope everybody had good summer vacation. I had my vacation >>> in >>> >> >> parts >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> and have next week as PTO. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> We should get started to close down on the upcoming Camel >>> 2.18 >>> >> >> >> release. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> There is some outstanding work (in no particular order) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 1) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Finish the spring boot stuff with the starter components. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Nicola comes back from PTO and will work on this. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 2) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> rest-dsl to support calling REST services. I am working on >>> >> this >>> >> >> and >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> have some outstanding work still around binding and other >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> improvements. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 3) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Tidy up the log4j v2 upgrade. Some of the examples do not >>> >> start >>> >> >> with >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> the jetty plugin. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 4) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Migrate the last wiki pages to adoc files. There is not so >>> >> many >>> >> >> >> pages >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> left and you can find a report when running camel-catalog >>> >> build >>> >> >> that >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> output what is missing. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> This will help us with a base-line for maintaining the >>> >> >> documentation >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> going forward in the source code adoc files instead of >>> wiki, >>> >> and >>> >> >> we >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> can then generate a new website and documentation for the >>> >> >> following >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> release (2.19 or 3.0) etc. But this is a discussion we >>> should >>> >> >> IMHO >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> take post 2.18. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 5) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> camel-test-karaf module. This module is in the works but >>> could >>> >> >> use >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> some review and finishing so its easier to use for end >>> users. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Notice the existing camel-test-blueprint is still favored >>> for >>> >> >> doing >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> unit tests which you can run fast and easily debug. The new >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> camel-test-karaf is for running integration tests in a >>> running >>> >> >> karaf >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> instance. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 6) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> We should look at the JIRA tickets that are assigned to >>> 2.18.0 >>> >> >> and >>> >> >> >> try >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> to fix / implement them, or move them to 2.18.1 or 2.19.0 >>> for >>> >> >> next >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> releases. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> 7) >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Keep an eye on the CI server to make sure the tests are >>> green. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Camel/ >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> If all goes well then hopefully in 2-3 weeks we are ready >>> to >>> >> cut >>> >> >> >> the 2.18.0 RC. >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> -- >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Claus Ibsen >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> ----------------- >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> -- >>> >> >> >> >>>> Claus Ibsen >>> >> >> >> >>>> ----------------- >>> >> >> >> >>>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>> >> >> >> >>>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Claus Ibsen >>> >> >> ----------------- >>> >> >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>> >> >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Claus Ibsen >>> >> ----------------- >>> >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>> >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Claus Ibsen >>> ----------------- >>> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>> >> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
