Hello,

I'm looking at fixing this.

The docs are included because they are versioned and part of the project
documentation. But the binaries should not be there.

Thanks.

Il giorno mar 8 giu 2021 alle ore 04:51 Justin Mclean <[email protected]>
ha scritto:

> Hi,
>
> I took a look at this release and found what I think are a couple of
> issues with it.
> - First off the LICENSE and NOTICE file don't seem to follow what is
> expected [1] in that:
> - There's 3rd party code in the release that is not mentioned in the
> LICENSE file. A quick search finds BSD and MIT licensed code.
> - The NOTICE file is not in the standard format [2] which includes a
> copyright year
> - There is what looks to be complied binary artefacts in the source
> release e.g. [3][4]
>
> I'm not on your PMC or part of your project, but if I was this release
> would have got a -1 from me.
>
> Although it possible that the docs were accidentally included in the
> source release? Were they meant to be included?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html
> 2. https://www.apache.org/licenses/NOTICE-2.0
> 3. ./docs/node/node
> 4.
> ./components/camel-lumberjack/src/test/resources/org/apache/camel/component/lumberjack/io/window10
>

Reply via email to