BTW, re-analyzing did not seem to have any effect. Therefore, if you notice that annotations remain there, please let me know and I'll take a look.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:17 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I removed the annotations on the PRs. It will remain on the existing ones > unless they are re-analyzed AFAIK, but future PRs should not have it. > > Kind regards > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:10 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, yeah, this is too verbose. I'll take a pause on the resume work to >> take a look at this. >> >> Kind regards >> >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:49 AM Zheng Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 to disable PMD checks or is it possible to exclude the generated >>> classes >>> ? >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:24 PM Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > When reviewing PRs then they are now very very long due to PMD checks >>> > reporting a ton of stuff that is not relevant - such as in the source >>> > code generated classes and much more. >>> > >>> > Either we should disable it, or find a way to make it "not shown" and >>> > that you can click a button or something to see the PMD if you want >>> > to. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Claus Ibsen >>> > ----------------- >>> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> -- >> Otavio R. Piske >> http://orpiske.net >> > > > -- > Otavio R. Piske > http://orpiske.net > -- Otavio R. Piske http://orpiske.net
