I noticed that the annotations are still there. I will remove those today. On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:19 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, > > re-analyzing did not seem to have any effect. Therefore, if you notice > that annotations remain there, please let me know and I'll take a look. > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:17 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I removed the annotations on the PRs. It will remain on the existing ones >> unless they are re-analyzed AFAIK, but future PRs should not have it. >> >> Kind regards >> >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:10 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, yeah, this is too verbose. I'll take a pause on the resume work to >>> take a look at this. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:49 AM Zheng Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to disable PMD checks or is it possible to exclude the generated >>>> classes >>>> ? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:24 PM Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi >>>> > >>>> > When reviewing PRs then they are now very very long due to PMD checks >>>> > reporting a ton of stuff that is not relevant - such as in the source >>>> > code generated classes and much more. >>>> > >>>> > Either we should disable it, or find a way to make it "not shown" and >>>> > that you can click a button or something to see the PMD if you want >>>> > to. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Claus Ibsen >>>> > ----------------- >>>> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >>>> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Otavio R. Piske >>> http://orpiske.net >>> >> >> >> -- >> Otavio R. Piske >> http://orpiske.net >> > > > -- > Otavio R. Piske > http://orpiske.net > -- Otavio R. Piske http://orpiske.net
