Also committer can. Anyone who is able to write to dist/dev could release. The promotion from dist/dev to dist/release must be done by a PMC member.
https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#upload-ci Il giorno mer 14 set 2022 alle ore 16:49 Pasquale Congiusti < pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hey Andrea, > I somehow understood that only PMC could perform releases. Could you please > clarify if that is correct? > > Thanks, > Pasquale. > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 2:59 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for the help, > > > > I think you could try to release yourself with the next 1.10.x or 1.11.0. > > > > https://github.com/apache/camel-k/blob/main/release.adoc > > > > Here there is a step by step guide I've been trying to improve. > > > > > > > > Il giorno mer 14 set 2022 alle ore 09:41 Tadayoshi Sato < > > sato.tadayo...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > Hi Andrea, > > > > > > > > > > It makes sense, we need to find a way to rotate the release manager, > > > > because especially post-release steps are time-consuming. > > > > > > > > > > I can volunteer for the release manager for Camel K. Let me know how I > > can > > > help. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 9:10 PM Andrea Cosentino <anco...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > It makes sense, we need to find a way to rotate the release manager, > > > > because especially post-release steps are time-consuming. > > > > > > > > But in the end it makes sense to follow LTS approach for both camel-k > > and > > > > camel-k-runtime, for the latter until we find a way to integrate the > > > > codebase in camel-quarkus directly. > > > > > > > > Il giorno mar 13 set 2022 alle ore 13:44 Claudio Miranda < > > > > clau...@claudius.com.br> ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:31 AM Pasquale Congiusti > > > > > <pasquale.congiu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure if this was discussed in the past, but here goes my > > > > > proposal > > > > > > to officially extend the LTS concept to Camel K releases as well. > > > Since > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > Sure, the LTS is a good idea for users and developers, +1. > > > > > > > > > > Camel has the LTS releases, and camel quarkus [1] seems to have a > LTS > > > > > too, but there is no camel-k-runtime LTS. > > > > > In this case the LTS concept would be extended to camel-k-runtime > and > > > > > sync the Camel K LTS with the camel quarkus/camel LTS releases ? > > > > > > > > > > 1. https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/next/index.html > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Claudio Miranda > > > > > > > > > > clau...@claudius.com.br > > > > > http://www.claudius.com.br > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Tadayoshi Sato > > > > > >
