Thanks for correct my mistake. Yes, Just carbon-spark-shell, I think carbon-spark-sql is more helpful than carbon-spark-shell, because it providing a method to interact with carbondata via sql command, rather than carbon api.
Based on what I mentioned above, I think carbondata can still keep carbon-spark-sql. Regards. Chenerlu. -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Whether-Carbondata-should-keep-carbon-spark-shell-script-tp14077p14087.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
