Hi, carbon-spark-shell was added to simplify the usage for first time users. I don't see any problem now of this feature to be removed. It is also simple code to be maintained. In case in future if this feature need to be modified because of spark compatible issues we can discuss again.
Regards, Ravindra. On 7 June 2017 at 09:42, Erlu Chen <chenerl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for correct my mistake. > > Yes, Just carbon-spark-shell, I think carbon-spark-sql is more helpful than > carbon-spark-shell, because it providing a method to interact with > carbondata via sql command, rather than carbon api. > > Based on what I mentioned above, I think carbondata can still keep > carbon-spark-sql. > > Regards. > Chenerlu. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev- > mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION- > Whether-Carbondata-should-keep-carbon-spark-shell- > script-tp14077p14087.html > Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list > archive at Nabble.com. > -- Thanks & Regards, Ravi
