Hi +1 for first considering solution1
Regards Liang xm_zzc wrote > Hi Raghu: > Yep, you are right, so I said solution 1 is not very precise when there > are still some data you want to update/delete being stored in stream > segments, solution 2 can handle this scenario you mentioned. > But, in my opinion, the scenario of deleting historical data is more > common than the one of updating data, the data size of stream table will > grow day by day, user generally want to delete specific data to make data > size not too large, for example, if user want to keep data for one year, > he > need to delete one year ago of data everyday. On the other hand, solution > 2 > is more complicated than solution 1, we need to consider the implement of > solution 2 in depth. > Based on the above reasons, Liang Chen, Jacky, David and I prefered to > implement Solution 1 first. Is it ok for you? > > Is there any other suggestion? > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/ -- Sent from: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/
