antl4 parse sql xuchuanyin <xuchuan...@apache.org> 于2019年8月17日周六 上午11:31写道：
> Hi, so glad to see Carbondata will enter stage 2.x and I have the following > suggestions for your consideration as following: > > 1. Evolution for Carbondata file format. > Previously I thought one of the key highlights of Carbondata is the > Carbondata file format, is there any evolution for that? > While Carbondata steps to a broader application scopes, will the current > file format still suite well for them? > > > 2. Performance commitment of Carbondata. > Seems that Carbondata cares more about expanding the scope of application > than the performance enhancemance. > What is the performance commitment of Carbondata 2 for > dataloading&querying? > Many enterprises do have big data, but that is not BIG enough to use > cloud/datalake etc. > For these scenarios, is Carbondata performance obviously better than other > fileFormat+executionEngine combination? > Do we have any plan for the enhancement? > > > 3. Smarter Carbondata. > As we suggested earlier, is Carbondata advisor on the roadmap? > Carbondata has many features, but I notice that part of them are never used > by the user. > While Carbondata will serve AI scope, can itself be smarter as well? > The Carbondata advisor is a DBA for Carbondata which will monitor the > workload, usage, current performance and give proper suggestions or even > can > do proper operation itself. > > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/ >
