-1 vote for Tornado. As far as I know, it still doesn't run on Windows and has had only 2 releases. I don't think it makes sense to push that as a dependency to potential deployers of this UI.
There are many alternatives with broader platform support and more consistent mainline releases: Bottle, CherryPy, Django, Paste/Pylons, Werkzeug On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Paul Bohm <boh...@gmail.com> wrote: > tornado +1 - it's lightweight and has few external dependencies. > > Pylons +4 > Tornado +3 > Django +1 > Undetermined +2 > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Ray Slakinski <ray.slakin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'll put in a vote for django, you can use managers to handle a lot of > the object code. > > > > Ray Slakinski > > > > On 2010-04-13, at 2:15 PM, Pablo Cuadrado wrote: > > > >> Pylons +4 > >> Tornado +2 > >> Django +1 > >> Undetermined +2 > >> > >> Do I smell Pylons? :) > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Pablo Cuadrado < > pablocuadr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > >>>> Well, so far we are: > >>>> > >>>> Pylons +3 > >>>> Tornado +2 > >>>> Django +1 > >>>> Undetermined +2 > >>>> > >>> > >>> +1 for pylons. I think a more popular framework is likely to have > better > >>> chances of being maintained and avoiding bitrot in the long haul. > >>> > >>> -Brandon > >>> > > > > >
