Yes, in the big picture, I guess Pylons has a greater community and adoption.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Miguel Verde <miguelitov...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 vote for Tornado. As far as I know, it still doesn't run on Windows and > has had only 2 releases. I don't think it makes sense to push that as a > dependency to potential deployers of this UI. > > There are many alternatives with broader platform support and more > consistent mainline releases: Bottle, CherryPy, Django, Paste/Pylons, > Werkzeug > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Paul Bohm <boh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> tornado +1 - it's lightweight and has few external dependencies. >> >> Pylons +4 >> Tornado +3 >> Django +1 >> Undetermined +2 >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Ray Slakinski <ray.slakin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I'll put in a vote for django, you can use managers to handle a lot of >> the object code. >> > >> > Ray Slakinski >> > >> > On 2010-04-13, at 2:15 PM, Pablo Cuadrado wrote: >> > >> >> Pylons +4 >> >> Tornado +2 >> >> Django +1 >> >> Undetermined +2 >> >> >> >> Do I smell Pylons? :) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Pablo Cuadrado < >> pablocuadr...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Well, so far we are: >> >>>> >> >>>> Pylons +3 >> >>>> Tornado +2 >> >>>> Django +1 >> >>>> Undetermined +2 >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> +1 for pylons. I think a more popular framework is likely to have >> better >> >>> chances of being maintained and avoiding bitrot in the long haul. >> >>> >> >>> -Brandon >> >>> >> > >> > >> >
