Yes. On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Johan Oskarsson <jo...@oskarsson.nu> wrote: > The consensus in this thread seems to be moving towards the following todos > in order to get 1072 into trunk. > > * create separate api methods for increments > * mark functionality as experimental > * further code cleanup (please comment on jira with specific suggestions) > > Is this a reasonable summary? We'll keep this thread updated as the work > progresses. > > /Johan > > On 6 sep 2010, at 16.47, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@apache.org> wrote: >>> The feature could still be marked experimental. >>> That should loosen the contract a little. But at least it would be >>> something to work with. >> >> Maybe this is the best approach, post- code cleanup. Although I'm >> reluctant to add code with known, significant limitations, the problem >> domain seems to be one with no silver bullets. > >
-- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com
