On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ryan King <r...@twitter.com> wrote: > Sorry, been catching up on this. > > From Twitter's perspective, 1546 is probably insufficient because it > doesn't allow one to do time-series data without supercolumns (which > might work ok, but require a good deal of work). Additionally, one of > our deployed systems already does supercolumns of counters, which is > not feasible in this design at all.
True, although wouldn't rows-of-counters give you basically the same thing if 1546 kept its counters as subcolumns of a supercolumn? -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support http://riptano.com
