2010/10/29 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:46:15 -0700 Chip Salzenberg <c...@pobox.com> wrote: > > CS> Short answer: "YES Please, but we will still want a side channel for > CS> minimum overhead." > > 100% agreed on both counts. But IIRC the fastest side channel is to > become a Cassandra node. Is that an option?
Yes. We call it the fat client. It's a non-storage gossip-participating cassandra node that speaks directly in terms of RowMutations, etc. Gary > > Ted > >
