On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:29:43 -0500 Gary Dusbabek <gdusba...@gmail.com> wrote:
GD> 2010/10/29 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:46:15 -0700 Chip Salzenberg <c...@pobox.com> wrote: >> CS> Short answer: "YES Please, but we will still want a side channel for CS> minimum overhead." >> >> 100% agreed on both counts. But IIRC the fastest side channel is to >> become a Cassandra node. Is that an option? GD> Yes. We call it the fat client. It's a non-storage GD> gossip-participating cassandra node that speaks directly in terms of GD> RowMutations, etc. Sorry, I meant to ask Chip "is that an option for you, as opposed to a general side channel usable from any language?" Ted
