On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:31 +0100, Stephen Connolly wrote: > From what I can see, the intent is to always release lock-step in sync > with cassandra, in which case the version number should be the > cassandra version number... > > unless you are implying that this is "CQL version 1.0.0" and there may > be a future time when you could have "CQL version 2.0.0" with a > different incompatible syntax...
CQL client versioning does *not* move in lock-step with either Cassandra or the CQL specification (though if you adhere to semver.org for both the spec and the library then *major* versions will effectively move in lock-step). -- Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com
