Based on CASSANDRA-11613 (and CASSANDRA-11760), I'm changing my vote to a
(non-binding) -1.  There is a legit regression in upgrading non-frozen UDTs
that needs to be fixed before releasing 3.6.

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Philip Thompson <
philip.thomp...@datastax.com> wrote:

> I've updated the TE report with the results of the upgrade testing we did.
> We experienced a higher than expected number of test failures, which
> prompted the filing of:
>
> CASSANDRA-11760
> CASSANDRA-11763
> CASSANDRA-11765
> CASSANDRA-11767
>
> Two errors were related to handling the legacy hint format after upgrades
> to 3.6 from either the 2.1 or 2.2 series. This should not affect upgrades
> from 3.0.x, or new 3.6 clusters. 11760 is an issue handling UDTs in
> mixed-versions 2.2.5 / 3.6 clusters.
>
> These four bugs were accompanied by other existing, known upgrade failures.
> We do not suspect that these four issues are 3.6 regressions, as we have
> tested this release with a large number of new upgrade tests, that were not
> run on previous tick-tock releases. I am re-running these tests against
> 3.4, to confirm that suspicion.
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Jake Luciani <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.6.
> >
> > sha1: c17cbe1875a974a00822ffbfad716abde363c8da
> > Git:
> >
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.6-tentative
> > Artifacts:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1112/org/apache/cassandra/apache-cassandra/3.6/
> > Staging repository:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1112/
> >
> > The artifacts as well as the debian package are also available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~jake
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed).
> >
> > [1]: http://goo.gl/Yv15Qz (CHANGES.txt)
> > [2]: http://goo.gl/VyR9EG (NEWS.txt)
> > [3]: https://goo.gl/raz8ok (DataStax QA Report)
> >
>



-- 
Tyler Hobbs
DataStax <http://datastax.com/>

Reply via email to