... and continuing in the fashion of behaviours one might like to disabuse
people of, no code link is provided.
On 18 October 2016 at 16:28, Michael Kjellman <mkjell...@internalcircle.com>
> We use posix_fadvise in a bunch of places, and in stereotypical Cassandra
> fashion no comments were provided.
> There is a check the OS is Linux (okay, a start) but it turns out the
> behavior of providing a length of 0 to posix_fadvise changed in some 2.6
> kernels. We don't check the kernel version -- or even note it.
> What is the *expected* outcome of our use of posix_fadvise -- not what
> does it do or not do today -- but what problem was it added to solve and
> what's the expected behavior regardless of kernel versions.
> Sent from my iPhone