We (Instaclustr) are also happy to get started testing. Including (internal to Instaclustr) production workloads.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:45 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > To be clear, more who is willing to commit to testing should we go this > route. > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 7:41 AM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok. So who's willing to test 4.0 on June 2nd? Let's start a sign up. > > > > We (tlp) will put some resources on this via going through some canned > > scenarios we have internally. We aren't in a position to test data > validity > > (yet) but we can do a lot around cluster behavior. > > > > Who else has specific stuff they are willing to do? Even if it's just > > tee'ing prod traffic, that would be hugely valuable. > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 6:15 AM Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > It sounds to me (please correct me if I'm wrong) like Jeff is arguing > >> that > >> > releasing 4.0 in 2 months isn't worth the effort of evaluating it, > >> because > >> > it's a big task and there's not enough stuff in 4.0 to make it > >> worthwhile. > >> > > >> > > >> More like "not enough stuff in 4.0 to make it worthwhile for the people > I > >> personally know to be willing and able to find the weird bugs". > >> > >> > >> > If that is the case, I'm not quite sure how increasing the surface > area > >> of > >> > changed code which needs to be vetted is going to make the process any > >> > easier. > >> > >> > >> It changes the interest level of at least some of the people able to > >> properly test it from "not willing" to "willing". > >> > >> Totally possible that there exist people who are willing and able to > find > >> and fix those bugs, who just haven't committed to it in this thread. > >> That's > >> probably why Sankalp keeps asking who's actually willing to do the > testing > >> on June 2 - if nobody's going to commit to doing real testing on June 2, > >> all we're doing is adding inconvenience to those of us who'd be willing > to > >> do it later in the year. > >> > > > -- Ben Bromhead CTO | Instaclustr <https://www.instaclustr.com/> +1 650 284 9692 Reliability at Scale Cassandra, Spark, Elasticsearch on AWS, Azure, GCP and Softlayer
