Looking at the doc again, I'm a bit concerned about this: > PMC roll call will be taken every 6 months. This is an email to dev@ w/the simple question to pmc members of “are you active on the project and plan to participate in voting over the next 6 months?”. This is strictly an exercise to get quorum count and in no way restricts ability to participate during this time window. A super-majority of this count becomes the low-watermark for votes in favour necessary to pass a motion, with new PMC members added to the calculation.
I imagine we'll see a lot of participation from folks in roll call, and less when it comes to votes. It's very easy to say we'll do something, it's another to follow through. A glance at any active community member's review board (including my own) will confirm that. Just to provide a quick example with some rough numbers - it doesn't seem unreasonable to me that we'll get a roll call of 15-20 votes. On the low end of that, we'd need 10 votes to pass anything and on the high end, 14. On the high end a vote with 13 +1 and one -1 would fail. Just to be clear, I am 100% in favor of increased participation and a higher bar on voting, but I'd like to ensure we don't set the bar so high we can't get anything done. Anyone else share this sentiment? On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:37 AM David Capwell <dcapw...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 nb > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jun 17, 2020, at 7:27 AM, Andrés de la Peña <a.penya.gar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 nb > > > >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 15:06, Sylvain Lebresne <lebre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> -- > >> Sylvain > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:58 PM Benjamin Lerer < > >> benjamin.le...@datastax.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:49 PM Marcus Eriksson <marc...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 17 June 2020 at 12:40:38, Sam Tunnicliffe (s...@beobal.com) wrote: > >>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 17 Jun 2020, at 09:11, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 nb > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 7:41 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 (binding) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 18:19, Joshua McKenzie > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Added unratified draft to the wiki here: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I propose the following: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. We leave the vote open for 1 week (close at end of day > >> 6/23/20) > >>>>>>>> unless there's a lot of feedback on the wiki we didn't get on > >> gdoc > >>>>>>>> 2. pmc votes are considered binding > >>>>>>>> 3. committer and community votes are considered advisory / > >>>> non-binding > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Any objections / revisions to the above? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> ~Josh > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >
