On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:27 PM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote:
> There's basically 1 java driver in the C* ecosystem. We have 3? 4? or more > operators in the ecosystem. Has one of them hit a clear supermajority of > adoption that makes it the de facto default and makes sense to pull it into > the project? > > We as a project community were pretty slow to move on building a PoV around > kubernetes so we find ourselves in a situation with a bunch of contenders > for inclusion in the project. It's not clear to me what heuristics we'd use > to gauge which one would be the best fit for inclusion outside letting > community adoption speak. > > --- > Josh McKenzie > > > We actually talked a good bit on the SIG call earlier today about heuristics. We need to document what functionality an operator should include at level 0, level 1, etc. We did discuss this a good bit during some of the initial SIG meetings, but I guess it wasn't really a focal point at the time. I think we should also provide references to existing operator projects and possibly other related projects. This would benefit both community users as well as people working on these projects. - John
